Moffitt trade voided: Update, traded to Denver instead.

Sarlacc83

Active member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,109
Reaction score
1
Location
Portland, OR
This has to be one of the strangest turns of events. But at least Moffitt will (hopefully) get to go to a winning organization now. I can't imagine what he's going to do the first time Manning yells at him, though. Probably laugh?
 

FlyingGreg

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Sarlacc83":32m2uy76 said:
This has to be one of the strangest turns of events. But at least Moffitt will (hopefully) get to go to a winning organization now. I can't imagine what he's going to do the first time Manning yells at him, though. Probably laugh?

If I'm Moffitt, I'm ecstatic to be going to Denver instead of Cleveland.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,932
Reaction score
2,372
Marvin49":2bt3z2ms said:
Jville":2bt3z2ms said:
SoHo9erFan":2bt3z2ms said:
Jesse Williams not panning out for you guys??
The unverified wisper word I recall was arthritic ... as in arthritic knee.

eeks.

That sucks. Still...he was a risky pick to begin with because of the knee. That's the only reason he was there to be drafted in that spot to begin with.

Sometimes you win with those and some times you lose. Was probably worth the risk.
Guys have played on arthritic knees. However, it does limit how many years they can play. Currently, Jesse plays too high and needs additional coaching.
 

jlwaters1

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
2,989
Reaction score
92
Now Moffitt's a DENVER BRONCO. Amazing. Seattle get's a big DT.
 

Marvin49

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
358
FlyingGreg":2jufta8v said:
Marvin49":2jufta8v said:
ok....let me restate....

My point was that its a pick you make late in a draft because it could hit big or flame out. You make that pick late in a draft because taking the player is a risk. The 49ers did the same with Marcus Lattimore.

It isn't a critcism. Its what you do to remain a really good team.

Yes, for sure - and why he was available in the 5th round. Just be careful using the word "risky" and "5th rounder" in the same sentence.

I didn't say 5th rounder. :D
 

Starrman44

New member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
814
Reaction score
0
Location
Canby, OR
Well, I actually feel better about this trade. I am glad he got to go to Denver instead of going to Cleveland. Hope it works out. I also was hoping that big #80 tight end was going to be traded here when I saw it was Denver. Man, he looked good. Isn't he from Portland State (ex basketball player or something). I would give them Fells straight up for him, lol.
 

Marvin49

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
358
Jville":2v1awbee said:
Marvin49":2v1awbee said:
Jville":2v1awbee said:
The unverified wisper word I recall was arthritic ... as in arthritic knee.

eeks.

That sucks. Still...he was a risky pick to begin with because of the knee. That's the only reason he was there to be drafted in that spot to begin with.

Sometimes you win with those and some times you lose. Was probably worth the risk.
Guys have played on arthritic knees. However, it does limit how many years they can play. Currently, Jesse plays too high and needs additional coaching.

I kinda always thought he looked really top heavy. Seemed to work at Alabama tho.
 

FlyingGreg

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Marvin49":1h858i2w said:
FlyingGreg":1h858i2w said:
Marvin49":1h858i2w said:
ok....let me restate....

My point was that its a pick you make late in a draft because it could hit big or flame out. You make that pick late in a draft because taking the player is a risk. The 49ers did the same with Marcus Lattimore.

It isn't a critcism. Its what you do to remain a really good team.

Yes, for sure - and why he was available in the 5th round. Just be careful using the word "risky" and "5th rounder" in the same sentence.

I didn't say 5th rounder. :D

No, you just said risky - which is wrong. Just embrace it, lol. I added the 5th round piece to illustrate the fallacy of calling it risky.
 

Throwdown

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
24,042
Reaction score
1,327
Location
Tacoma, WA
To me he's Red Bryant part 2, top heavy, struggles with getting leverage. But for Red it was because he was so much taller than everyone else in those trenches.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,932
Reaction score
2,372
RobBaker7714409":j6powuci said:
Why the heck would there be a picture of him suited up in pads if he never passed the physical?

I think some teams use the failed physical as an option out tool when they change their mind. This seems to me to be a Cleveland exercise in negotiating in bad faith. However, Cleveland isn't the only one that indulges in that tactic. Player agents keep track of such things and it can have an impact on future events. Moffit is better off in Denver.
 

MizzouHawkGal

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
13,478
Reaction score
850
Location
Kansas City, MO
Blitzer88":3d58h7er said:
Well this whole is interesting. Still don't understand how a player can fail a physical with one team and than quickly pass one with another. Either way I wish John the best and hope the guy we get turns into something positive for us.
Because each organization has different parameters for their physicals just like in the draft.
 

Marvin49

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
358
FlyingGreg":2mf2sacu said:
Marvin49":2mf2sacu said:
FlyingGreg":2mf2sacu said:
Yes, for sure - and why he was available in the 5th round. Just be careful using the word "risky" and "5th rounder" in the same sentence.

I didn't say 5th rounder. :D

No, you just said risky - which is wrong. Just embrace it, lol. I added the 5th round piece to illustrate the fallacy of calling it risky.

To quote the Princess Bride...

"You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means". :D

Choosing Jesse....or Marcus Lattimore or Tank Carradine for that matter...is a risk regardless of where you draft them. You risk losing little because you have given up a lower value pick, but it's a risk. Its a calculated risk and in these cases the possible reward justifies the risk, but it's a risk nonetheless.

At this point tho, we are simply arguing english. We are saying the same thing a different way.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,925
Reaction score
2,554
Something smells and it's Cleveland's position here.

Brian Sanford may become available with the final cuts anyways.
 

FlyingGreg

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Marvin49":29zhj1r1 said:
To quote the Princess Bride...

"You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means". :D

Choosing Jesse....or Marcus Lattimore or Tank Carradine for that matter...is a risk regardless of where you draft them. You risk losing little because you have given up a lower value pick, but it's a risk. Its a calculated risk and in these cases the possible reward justifies the risk, but it's a risk nonetheless.

At this point tho, we are simply arguing english. We are saying the same thing a different way.

I just think we see it differently. What's the "risk"? If we had traded for Williams, I would agree it's a risk. But I don't put a lot of value on a 5th round pick...so IMO, there's no risk. It is high reward, however - if they blossom, like Richard Sherman.

Anyways, I'll stop hijacking this thread.
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,974
Reaction score
0
Williams allegedly has battled knee soreness this month, but when I watch him I don't see a good player battling through injury. I see a fast moving healthy looking player with bad technique.

Williams has been a disappointment, but I wouldn't write his career epitaph just yet. Even if he is released, I bet we'll see him back on the roster in the future, unless another team grabs him.

I don't know anything about this new guy from Denver, but if he's an above average run defender, Seattle got a nice return. We don't have any real depth there. Obviously, Williams does not look the part yet. Hill anchors poorly and has more of a 3-tech skillset. McDaniel is lanky (6'7") and would probably struggle with leverage. Red Bryant is our 5-tech. Clinton McDonald is solid as a run defender, but does he make the roster? Maybe the new and improved Jaye Howard (talk about irony)? If this new guy is a better run defender than McDonald and McDaniel, I think he's got a shot to make the team.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,932
Reaction score
2,372
FlyingGreg":rncwig7d said:
Here's an interesting twist, apparently Moffitt asked for a trade earlier this spring:

He was losing a training camp battle for the right guard job with J.R. Sweezy this summer. He said he asked in the spring to be traded, but was told no.

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.s ... cart_river

From the article >>>
He was losing a training camp battle for the right guard job with J.R. Sweezy this summer. He said he asked in the spring to be traded, but was told no.

“I was a little shocked,'' he said of the trade. “I didn't see it coming, but then I was excited. I thought I had been playing very good football. I think I'm in the best football shape I've been in. I'm excited to be here, where I think it's a better opportunity.''
I don't know why he was shocked. The quote I remember from previous years was "Seattle is not a prison". The Seahawks want those who want to be in Seattle.
 

Shadowhawk

New member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1,513
Reaction score
0
kearly":358rzp8j said:
Williams allegedly has battled knee soreness this month, but when I watch him I don't see a good player battling through injury. I see a fast moving healthy looking player with bad technique.

Williams has been a disappointment, but I wouldn't write his career epitaph just yet. Even if he is released, I bet we'll see him back on the roster in the future, unless another team grabs him.

Defensive tackle isn't exactly the easiest position for a rookie to come into the league and look good right out of the blocks, especially if (which I believe to be the case) said rookie got by in college by power and talent rather than technique. I doubt the team is giving up on Williams long term, but it seems pretty obvious that they are looking for an upgrade this year.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
36,006
Reaction score
17,004
Location
Sammamish, WA
As far as a place to live, talk about a huge uprade. My pops lived in denver for a long time, awesome city. Cleveland is a hole, went there for the road game a few years back. Can't fathom living there.
 

Hawkscanner

New member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
2,145
Reaction score
0
Location
Middle of Nowhere, Washington
Sarlacc83":38c26cip said:
This has to be one of the strangest turns of events. But at least Moffitt will (hopefully) get to go to a winning organization now. I can't imagine what he's going to do the first time Manning yells at him, though. Probably laugh?

Hmmm ... kind of reminds me a bit of when Bill Bavasi traded Carlos Guillen to the Cleveland Indians for a then 36 year old Omar Vizquel prior to the 2004 Season. I remember there being quite a public outcry amongst the M's fanbase ... and then mysteriously somehow Vizquel fails his physical immediately thereafter.

Now to be completely fair, Vizquel was coming off a season in which he'd had 2 knee surgeries ... BUT in 2004 Omar went on to hit .294 ... had 165 hits ... scored 82 runs ... had a .741 OPS ... and stole 19 bases for the Indians. IMO that "failed physical" was merely a PR move by Bavasi in an attempt to save face. As far as this situation with Moffitt and the Browns is concerned ... I have no idea what to make of it. Obviously the Broncos doctors didn't seem to have any real concerns.
 
Top