Micah Parsons *possible* trade incoming?

BirdsCommaAngry

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
1,725
Reaction score
813
It's probably two 1sts and a 3rd just to get the conversation started. Then there's potential for outbids and/or Jerruh wanting to salvage what he can from his errors by pushing the limits on his return.

Personally, I got mixed feelings here. Big trades are big trades and their track record isn't great. We might not be good enough to contend even with Parsons and would be better off having more opportunities to string together some incredible drafts. On the other hand, a trade here is probably the most realistic option to get the suffocating defense this team would need to contend. It's certainly the fastest option.
 

Hawkstud

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2025
Messages
277
Reaction score
349
Would love to have him on the team, but I believe he'd be way too pricey.
I hear tell that he might end up going to either the Chargers, Raiders or Cardinals
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
7,973
Reaction score
6,228
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
This Parsons thing has really solidified my personal opinion that ownership has WAY too much control over its player's careers. Two things alone are ridiculous to me: The franchise tag, and the length of control teams have over player's initial contracts, most specifically their first round picks. It's bad enough that a college player can't even choose where they want to work, but they can be stuck playing for a crappy franchise for up to seven years if they are a first round pick (five years on the initial contract plus two franchise tags). If you're a first round pick as a running back, you could be nearing the end of your prime by the time you're up for your second contract.

Now I know it doesn't always come to this, but it's remarkable to me how little actual leverage players have over owners at certain significant times during their careers. I can't believe that things like this won't be at the top of the agenda for the player's union when the next CBA comes around.
So a draft pick is required to sign a 5-7 year contract? I mean if he doesn’t like it he can sign a shorter contract right? I’m not sure about how much negotiating the rookies can do, also about the pick your team thing, there is no way that guys coming into the league can pick where they go or it would be college all over
 

hawks85

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2014
Messages
1,634
Reaction score
1,167
Location
Seattle, Washington
Parsons has already stated if/when he's traded he wants to come to Seattle because of Durde. The only question is, will Seattle pull the trigger? Who or what will they give up if they do pursue him? Parsons is an absolute monster that's for damn sure, but if Seattle does end up getting him hopefully they don't overpay.
 

Hollandhawk

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2009
Messages
1,255
Reaction score
1,365
So a draft pick is required to sign a 5-7 year contract? I mean if he doesn’t like it he can sign a shorter contract right? I’m not sure about how much negotiating the rookies can do, also about the pick your team thing, there is no way that guys coming into the league can pick where they go or it would be college all over
Negotiating contract length is not an option for draft picks..
 

Seahawker

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
4,786
Reaction score
3,247
The salary cap is at 279M, the owners need some leverage to field a competitive team and not be held hostage by the players agents. There is risk/reward on both sides, but the players are not miners making 100K from a rich gold producer. Without the franchise tag agents would have even more power & influence than they do now. 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 million a season ain't chicken scratch to play a game.
Images 1Every teams bigest cap hit in 2025 updated v0 g8j142bnqxme1
 

silvergun

Active member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
432
Reaction score
78
Would love to have him but the cost is just too much. If we were one player away, then sure…but we’re not.
 
N

NoGain

Guest
Yeah, those poor bastards and the millions of dollars pouring into their bank accounts.
This is kind of the knee-jerk response you almost expect to get when you share such an opinion. I'm speaking about the position/standing of the players relative to that of the owners, not to you or anyone else's position/standing in life. Please.

First of all, these players are the elite of the elite of the elite, the ones who make it. Secondly, there is no NFL that millions love so much and pay for in so many ways without the players. They are the entertainment, not the owners, many of whom just inherited their wealth and their teams. What about those poor billionaire bastards who have millions pouring into their bank accounts on top of the hundreds of millions and billions added to their net worth's as a result of the players who play the game and are the source of their big incomes and skyrocketing net worth's?

Yes, within this context I do think the owners have too much control over the lives of the players during significant periods of their careers. Now you could say that the players agreed to such things through their union's negotiations with the owners. But even then, the players do not have the leverage that the owners have over them. Unlike, say, professional soccer with multiple quality professional leagues, the NFL is really the only game in town. A monopoly.

Anyway...
 

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,212
Reaction score
2,255
We have good edges outside linebackers in guys like Derek Hall and Boye Mafe and Uchenna. Parsons is probably the best in the league at that position no doubt but is he worth given up 2 firsts for and then paying him $50 million a year. I don’t think so. We got a nice front I want to hold onto our draft capital
Nwosu is hurt 85% of the time. So we can’t count on him. And Mafe is average, and disappointed last season to be frank. Hall seems to have the most upside. But we need another rusher. Obvy2 first and a 3rd is a big cost, but it also probably makes our D a top 2-3 unit.
 

Seahawker

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
4,786
Reaction score
3,247
Stay the course and keep our cap room and draft picks. Extend our own guys in 26' and fill holes in the draft. Don't get another credit card when you just paid off three of them.
Now if Jerry would accept a 1st & 3rd rounder and Parsons agreed to a bargain deal, sure.
Lets not be foolhardy & reckless.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
14,803
Reaction score
10,402
Location
SoCal Desert
I can see a mental struggle, Parsons wants to join Macdonald, it's a matter of how much discount he is willing to offer.
 

FrodosFinger

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
3,612
Reaction score
3,924
Micah Parsons style was made for Macdonald’s defense but again I just hate to give up that kind of draft capital unless he commits to more a long term incentive laden deal
 

Hawkinaz

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
2,443
Reaction score
1,845
Location
Henry County, Virginia
I don’t know what the Cowboys problem is, it’s not money there are over $30 million under the cap and of their present cap going into 2025 $24 million was dedicated to Parson’s
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
7,973
Reaction score
6,228
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
I don’t know what the Cowboys problem is, it’s not money there are over $30 million under the cap and of their present cap going into 2025 $24 million was dedicated to Parson’s
Jerry Jones is just weird.
He’s like a degenerate gambler who won a jackpot once and thinks now he knows how to beat a slot machine….
 

Latest posts

Top