Hawkscanner
New member
I think that most of us would agree that last night's win was perhaps one of the costliest in Seahawks history. Losing Richard Sherman for the rest of the season (and perhaps for the rest of his career here in Seattle) is one heck of a blow. As much as this sucks, I'm one of those who turns fairly quickly and asks himself, "Now what?" I'd love to get some thoughts and discussion going on what's next moving forward.
It goes without saying that you can't replace a Richard Sherman. You just can't replace one of the best CB's in the game. BUT ... I'm wondering just how truly devastating of the blow this truly is and whether or not the Seahawks can work around it.
My immediate thoughts as far as a replacement is concerned ... (I think quite naturally) is DeShawn Shead. Shead has returned to practice and there seems to already be quite a bit of discussion on whether or not he's going to be activated and in uniform against the Falcons.
According to Pro Football Focus, Shead had a passer rating against of 90.3 in games that he started opposite Richard Sherman. To put that into perspective, that's about what Shaq Griffin has given the Seahawks thus far.
Also, I'd forgotten that Shead was quite a force against the run ...

Source:
https://www.profootballfocus.com/ne...uld-be-sidelined-well-into-the-regular-season
So, IF Earl Thomas comes back and is anywhere close to his normal self (again, that's quite debateable) ... and if Chancellor is OK (again, we'll see) ... then I'm wondering just how much of a death blow Sherman going down truly is. Justin Coleman has been outstanding as a slot corner, so that appears to be pretty locked down. If they can find enough coins in the couch cushions, I'd expect Schneider to make a move to sign Byron Maxwell (who obviously knows our system and how to play our style of ball) -- so that would give this team some depth there.
Moving forward, I'd say that this group may not be the Legion of Boom that we're used to seeing ... but I don't know that I'd say that opposing QB's are going to automatically suddenly start lighting this secondary up either. If the Hawks can continue to generate a consistent pass rush (which is always key to great secondary play anyway) ... I'm wondering if they can get by and still remain a fairly stout secondary. Could this version of the LOB be (perhaps) say ... 65-70% of themselves moving forward? Maybe.
I dunno. Thoughts guys?
It goes without saying that you can't replace a Richard Sherman. You just can't replace one of the best CB's in the game. BUT ... I'm wondering just how truly devastating of the blow this truly is and whether or not the Seahawks can work around it.
My immediate thoughts as far as a replacement is concerned ... (I think quite naturally) is DeShawn Shead. Shead has returned to practice and there seems to already be quite a bit of discussion on whether or not he's going to be activated and in uniform against the Falcons.
According to Pro Football Focus, Shead had a passer rating against of 90.3 in games that he started opposite Richard Sherman. To put that into perspective, that's about what Shaq Griffin has given the Seahawks thus far.
Also, I'd forgotten that Shead was quite a force against the run ...

Source:
https://www.profootballfocus.com/ne...uld-be-sidelined-well-into-the-regular-season
So, IF Earl Thomas comes back and is anywhere close to his normal self (again, that's quite debateable) ... and if Chancellor is OK (again, we'll see) ... then I'm wondering just how much of a death blow Sherman going down truly is. Justin Coleman has been outstanding as a slot corner, so that appears to be pretty locked down. If they can find enough coins in the couch cushions, I'd expect Schneider to make a move to sign Byron Maxwell (who obviously knows our system and how to play our style of ball) -- so that would give this team some depth there.
Moving forward, I'd say that this group may not be the Legion of Boom that we're used to seeing ... but I don't know that I'd say that opposing QB's are going to automatically suddenly start lighting this secondary up either. If the Hawks can continue to generate a consistent pass rush (which is always key to great secondary play anyway) ... I'm wondering if they can get by and still remain a fairly stout secondary. Could this version of the LOB be (perhaps) say ... 65-70% of themselves moving forward? Maybe.
I dunno. Thoughts guys?