akscoundrel
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2013
- Messages
- 391
- Reaction score
- 60
scutterhawk":2ump4q2p said:Okay, so (excluding Golden Tate) can you explain how we were able to win it all last Season without Harvin.akscoundrel":2ump4q2p said:Percy is an easy cop out, but I disagree. The difference has been our defense getting healthy and suffocating opponents. Offense still has a long ways to go. Offense has been better at times, but that just boiled down to handing lynch the ball, which you can't blame percy for.
It's a complete fallacy to claim that teams don't need an offense to win.
Marshawn Lynch is essential to the Seahawks Offense, but Russell Wilson's ability to scramble, is also a huge part of the Seahawks Offensive success.
Percy Harvin wasn't pertinent to the Seahawks Offensive success, and in fact there was an obvious erosion that was developing with Percy on the roster, and because he didn't feel the need to conform, you do what Pete an John did, you jet-tison his young distracting ass, and be thankful that there was a team that was willing to take him.
Not sure what you're trying to argue besides the obvious, yes a team needs to score more points than the other team to win.
Last year, yes, we had Tate. Also had rice a good amount of time and miller. Kearse and Baldwin weren't dropping big plays. Bevell wasn't going full potato and not handing marshawn the ball. And even with all that, there were plenty of games where our offense was pretty anemic.