SNDavidson
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,926
- Reaction score
- 815
I think DavidSeven jumped to a conclusion in concluding that we all jumped to a conclusion. In conclusion, we already have mods, no need to tell people what to do.
SharkHawk":3fuaworr said:-The Glove-":3fuaworr said:SharkHawk":3fuaworr said:Good thing Sherman never blew a coverage this year. EVER. He's perfect. And now being a great teammate to boot.
Wow, man, wow. A specific play was brought up. He commented on it honestly. Does that mean he's somehow a bad teammate now?
What are you talking about? I said he's never blown a coverage. EVER. He's perfect. How does my statement cause you to make such a leap? This is just like twitter. We can say whatever veiled thing we want, and frame it however we want later. I never put in any emoticons alluding to sarcasm. So how do you know I'm not saying Richard Sherman is a great teammate?
On an entirely different note..... when you're in kindergarten, you typically learn this little thing about saying nice things. Whether it's "honest" or not, there are some things that don't ever need to be said. Being a good teammate sometimes means shutting your mouth, even when asked a question about a specific play that was one where a teammate didn't play it 100% correct. Maybe as good teammates we say something to the effect of, "Well, there were a lot of plays in that game that could have gone differently, I don't think it's right to point at one specific play." It's "playerspeak" but players who speak that way tend to be much more respected and welcomed by their teammates. Those teams function better. They tend to win.
We have rules here too... and although many things we could jump on here and say are TRUE, the rules say we can't attack other posters. So being true doesn't make it right. Or am I wrong there too? Leaving things out there dangling and open to interpretation to a lot of followers like has happened in this case, whether misconstrued or not is not a good idea. Your view differs. Wow, MANNNNNNN, WOW!
Quit telling us what to do! We have mods! /sarcasm (don't know how to post an emoticon on my phone)SNDavidson":1qf3k6ll said:Everyone stop concluding things!!!
This is very true...gotta love the offseasonJSeahawks":3dro9ikq said:As a mod I have concluded that we all like to argue about meaninless junk.
JSeahawks":10z4ixhu said:Are we sure this isnt all just a fat joke at Brandon Browners expense? He is pretty beefy.
bestfightstory":cylybhm0 said:What IS surprising is that Kam Chancellor would rather ply with Kelly Jennings.
drdiags":jocr8ihl said:bestfightstory":jocr8ihl said:What IS surprising is that Kam Chancellor would rather ply with Kelly Jennings.
Just got through watching Starz's Spartacus season 1 and the prequel. This typo gives me bad images that I was hoping to discard.
SNDavidson":c1qhqbqk said:No idea what that's all about, but Sherm half-called out Kam somewhat by accident on NFL Network when he was discussing the Roddy White TD. He didn't mean to, kind of a heat of the moment, like "I'm not the type to call out my team mates but...". Obviously I have no Idea what they're talking about though.
I've seen their posts back and forth as well. I wouldn't have thought anything of it if it wasn't for what Kam posted afterwardsSouthSoundHawk":14hytqym said:I've seen these types of tweets back and forth between these guys...it usually has to do with vidoe games or music.
Not putting any stock in this as "beef."
SharkHawk":2ec0tq21 said:Good thing Sherman never blew a coverage this year. EVER. He's perfect. And now being a great teammate to boot.