toffee
Well-known member
12-13 are leading in this poll
Actually 11 and 12 wins are leading12-13 are leading in this poll
I voted 10 because of the weak schedule, but my thinking is basically this. ^^^I voted 8 wins.
The defense will be great. Our schedule is filled with eak teams. We improved the offence's coaching and Zabel has to be an update over Tomlinson.
But Darnold and Kupp are no replacement for Geno and DK. The OL should be better but there is only so much the new coaching staff and scheme can do to improve Hayne, Olu, Bradford, etc... We'll be lucky if our OL ranking improves to 22nd or higher. Darnold will be under pressure most games.
Plus Kubiak's scheme is not new (many teams run versions of it) and a lot of defenses have it figured.
I think our defense will keep most game close but our offense will struggle to score. Wouldn't be surprised that we lose more games we should have won than win games we should have lost.
I set the poll up to prevent anything below 7.Five wasn’t an option, so I wasn’t able to vote
I was aiming for the 20 and got 11 tooWhile I agree with you on the defense and the offense could be top 10. Does it click for the offense week 1? week 6? week 11 like the defense did last year? at all? Those remain to be unseen for me.
If it clicks week 1, with this schedule I say 13 wins. If it doesn't at all I say 4 wins. I think the offense will start to click around week 4 or 5, at least see glimpses of it more consistently so that's how I came up with 11 wins. That and I threw a dart at a dartboard and that's what it landed on.
Did you mean Saints?Under 8. Sorry, but I can see this team mirroring what happened to the Bears last season. I think the offense will be ok at the start of the season, but once opponents have seen it and there are 1 or 2 injuries it'll be a hard slog. 3-2 after 5 but 6-11 for the year.
The Bears were 4-2 at their bye week, but they finished 5-12. Once teams saw what the offense could and couldn't do they were neutralised. Fields threw the ball to the perimeter, (be it short, long, or wide), where receivers could react to the pass. He struggled when that was taken away and he had to go to the middle where accuracy and timing were critical. Only twice after Week 6 did they score 21+ points. They were held to 14- or less 5 times in that stretch.Did you mean Saints?
Okay, gotcha. I see what you're saying. I thought you were making a comment on how Kubiak's Saints got off to a fast start last year, then quickly went downhill.The Bears were 4-2 at their bye week, but they finished 5-12. Once teams saw what the offense could and couldn't do they were neutralised. Fields threw the ball to the perimeter, (be it short, long, or wide), where receivers could react to the pass. He struggled when that was taken away and he had to go to the middle where accuracy and timing were critical. Only twice after Week 6 did they score 21+ points. They were held to 14- or less 5 times in that stretch.
The Seahawks offense is better than the 2024 Bears. However, they lack dynamic, big-play players. Long methodical drives are hard to build a season around without either a sledge-hammer running game or depth at receiver. Maybe the O-Line blossoms and Darnold shines. Maybe the rookie receivers can play like starters. Maybe the defense plays like a top 3 defense. At this point there's hope.
Never thought of it that way but you're right. We do real well on the road usually. Why not go back to throttling people at home like they're on fentanyl. Powerless to resistIf we can shake our home field disadvantage, there is no reason this roster can't get 12 wins.
I think Seattle's wanting to run the ball and take shots with Valdez Scantling and Arroyo .Okay, gotcha. I see what you're saying. I thought you were making a comment on how Kubiak's Saints got off to a fast start last year, then quickly went downhill.
I would agree that we're better off than the 2024 Bears. They had Shane Waldron as their offensive coordinator.