JSN @ 40+ million per?

TraderGary

Active member
Joined
May 25, 2020
Messages
407
Reaction score
165
Pay him.

He has great rapport Darnold, without JSN our offense straight up doesn’t work.

The threat of JSN opens up our running game and entire offense. Not to mention without JSN the cupboard is bare at WR.

Outside of him we got a gadget burner dude, an old WR that doesn’t have it anymore and a promising prospect with health issues.

We do not win the Super Bowl without JSN, we do not win a shoot out with the Rams without JSN.

We don’t have a choice here. It’ll be a mute point by the time the end of his contract anyways.

This isn’t a situation like DK Metcalf. We have the best to second best wideout in the NFL that has undeniable chemistry with our QB.

You don’t mess with that.
Was about to post the same thing.

Without a replacement or anyone else close to a number one receiver on the current roster, JSN has all the leverage and he knows it, and is taking advantage of it like any good businessperson would do.

He owns all the cards because without him, our RB's will consistently be facing an 8-man box. On a run-first team, that simply would not work. Our entire offense would be dead.

We need JSN more than he needs us and he knows it. It's just the way it is.
 

TraderGary

Active member
Joined
May 25, 2020
Messages
407
Reaction score
165
It would be foolish for a $30M+ player like Smith-Njigba to play out this season for $2.716M. He's under contract for $2.716M this year and $24.4M, (give or take), next year, but pretty much all that contract does is stop him playing elsewhere.

I'm not going to say what the player or management will do as many players have played out their contract in the past. Historically the Seahawks are late to extend their players, and they don't do so until their hand is forced.
Okay so doing a little simple math, let's take that $2.716M and the $24.4M, and add 2 more years at $40M each. That totals $107.116M. Divide it by 4 and you have $26.78M per year. That would be a serious bargain for the team, (easy for me to say as it's not my money), and also give JSN and his family security against the possibility of a serious injury, god forbid.

Or you could even add a 5th year at $45M, which works out to $30.42M per year. Still a bargain from a team standpoint, even more security for JSN and his family, and he would still have recognition as being the highest paid WR in the league.

That seems rather simple and logical to me. Am I missing something?
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,708
Reaction score
1,934
Location
Taipei
Paying 10 per for an RB way more appealing to me than paying ANY WR 40 per. WR just doesn't return the investment for their perceived value. It is such a dependent position.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
41,742
Reaction score
4,539
Location
Roy Wa.
Salary cap will go up another 10 or 15 million minimum by the time we sign him, secondly every salary if outlandish now, also most of you would have cut Steve Largent and Walter Jones also because the deserved to be paid. 🫤
 

HawkRiderFan

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
2,747
Reaction score
1,906
Considering how he took off from the middle of 2024 on, it's not really accurate to say he's only had 1 good year. I would say his potential got unlocked once the Hawks started using him properly.

There was also a comment about him not putting up the numbers at the end of the year in the biggest games? Seriously?? How can one have watched the NFCCG and say that??
Also as far has his numbers in the other 2 games:
-Div Semi-Final. We didn't really need a passing attack once the game got out of hand so early. And he also got a TD
-Super Bowl - as good a job as Gonzalez did, had Sam been on target, JSN has over 100 and 2 TDs in the Super Bowl
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rat

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
12,786
Reaction score
8,852
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Nobody turns on their own faster than a Seahawks fan when a player reveals they want more than the bare minimum to put their long-term health seriously at risk to entertain people who would cry to management if they found out their co-worker was making 50 cents more an hour than them.
 
Last edited:

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,708
Reaction score
1,934
Location
Taipei
Nobody turns on their own faster than a Seahawks fan when a player reveals they want more than the bare minimum to entertain people who would cry to management if they found out their co-worker was making 50 cents more an hour than them, by putting their long-term health seriously at risk.
nobody turned. debating the merits of paying a WR top dollar and if it is conducive to winning football is a worthy debate.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
43,998
Reaction score
28,079
Location
Sammamish, WA
Worthy, yes, but Rat makes a really good point. Hawks fans, at least MANY of them turn on a dime if I player wants a big contract.
Can't fault a guy for wanting his. Not saying a bunch of people on here, but plenty out there who seem to live in some fantasy world that a player should just take way less money and want to stay here. Football is also a business, and players should try to get the best contracts they can.
 
Last edited:

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,626
Reaction score
2,879
Okay so doing a little simple math, let's take that $2.716M and the $24.4M, and add 2 more years at $40M each. That totals $107.116M. Divide it by 4 and you have $26.78M per year. That would be a serious bargain for the team, (easy for me to say as it's not my money), and also give JSN and his family security against the possibility of a serious injury, god forbid.

Or you could even add a 5th year at $45M, which works out to $30.42M per year. Still a bargain from a team standpoint, even more security for JSN and his family, and he would still have recognition as being the highest paid WR in the league.

That seems rather simple and logical to me. Am I missing something?
I think the only thing you're missing is NONE of that $107M (or $152M with a 5th year) is guaranteed... and therefore your proposal would be a non-starter with Jaxon and his agent.

Otoh, if years one, two, and three were fully guaranteed... $67M in escrow... I believe it would also be a non-starter because Jaxon would not be protected from a serious injury... so a signing bonus would likely become a necessity for Jaxxon and his agent... they would require money up front.

So, let's hypothetically add a 5th year at your suggested $45M... bring the total up to $152M. Top of the market fully guaranteed money for WRs is currently $110M... so let's assume Jaxon would get $115M for the time being.

Now the question becomes... how much signing bonus do you want to give Jaxon and keep his 2026 cap hit somewhat team-friendly (currently projected to be $4.6M). Anything less than $20M would be insulting imo... so let's assume it's $20M, which John and his cap management team would balk it.

What this little exercise tells me is... it makes no good sense to extend Jaxon until after the 2026 season... when the Hawks have the 5th year option to work with salary cap-wise.

The only potential sticking point with waiting is Jaxon's 2026 salary is only $2.7M... not even 2x what he was physically paid in 2025 ($1.55M).
 

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
3,626
Reaction score
2,199
Worthy, yes, but Rat makes a really good point. Hawks fans, at least MANY of them turn on a dime if I player wants a big contract.
Can't fault a guy for wanting his. Not saying a bunch of people on here, but plenty out there who seem to live in some fantasy world that a player should just take way less money and want to stay here. Football is also a business, and players should try to get the best contracts they can.
They have every right to pursue whatever amount they want. The question is if it's best for the team to invest that much.
 

Grahamhawker

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
3,995
Reaction score
1,116
Location
Graham, WA
nobody turned. debating the merits of paying a WR top dollar and if it is conducive to winning football is a worthy debate.
This.

The worst I've seen posted here is akin to "It's only been one year", which is mostly true. The majority of the discussion has been how (or if) to manage the perceived top receiver contract in the league. He deserves it if any player ever did imo, especially if he puts up comparable numbers next year. Discussing how to manage the situation and its nebulous impacts is hardly 'turning' on JSN.
 

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
3,626
Reaction score
2,199
I get it, valid question. 40 mil for any non-QB is a hell of a lot of coin.
We moved on from DK and his desire for top dollar and won the super bowl.
Now JSN is better and not a hot headed idiot. So it's not exactly the same but I personally think sinking that much capital into one players is a mistake.
 

Latest posts

Top