RolandDeschain
Well-known member
Careful, you're mistaking fantasy wishes with reality.ExpatPack":2kjbzx65 said:Except that Kam may be the one who gets racked back to childhood if he tries to hit Gronk on anything but a blind side.
Careful, you're mistaking fantasy wishes with reality.ExpatPack":2kjbzx65 said:Except that Kam may be the one who gets racked back to childhood if he tries to hit Gronk on anything but a blind side.
CPHawk":25rtxmne said:Who cares? Honestly, In the last 3 years only one TE gave us any problems, and it was 150 degrees that game. Lane won't even be the one asked to stop Gronk, KJ and Kam will take Gronk out of the game. If there is one thing I'm sure of, it's that Gronk won't be the reason NE wins.
RolandDeschain":15lmgumr said:Careful, you're mistaking fantasy wishes with reality.ExpatPack":15lmgumr said:Except that Kam may be the one who gets racked back to childhood if he tries to hit Gronk on anything but a blind side.![]()
Give us a stat sheet that Gronk will have to be under for you to come in here and admit that the LoB owns Gronk, then.ExpatPack":1nu9zmm8 said:You think it's going to be that easy? LOL. I'm no Patriots fan but come on, take the blinders off. I certainly think the LOB can limit the Pats WRs, but Gronk is a whole 'nother animal.
RolandDeschain":iionsb2n said:Give us a stat sheet that Gronk will have to be under for you to come in here and admit that the LoB owns Gronk, then.ExpatPack":iionsb2n said:You think it's going to be that easy? LOL. I'm no Patriots fan but come on, take the blinders off. I certainly think the LOB can limit the Pats WRs, but Gronk is a whole 'nother animal.
Seriously, if we hold Gronk to fewer than X yards and X TDs, you'll praise the LoB. Gonna man up?![]()
I'd do the same thing; admit that Gronk bested the LoB.ExpatPack":33gzqcri said:RolandDeschain":33gzqcri said:Give us a stat sheet that Gronk will have to be under for you to come in here and admit that the LoB owns Gronk, then.ExpatPack":33gzqcri said:You think it's going to be that easy? LOL. I'm no Patriots fan but come on, take the blinders off. I certainly think the LOB can limit the Pats WRs, but Gronk is a whole 'nother animal.
Seriously, if we hold Gronk to fewer than X yards and X TDs, you'll praise the LoB. Gonna man up?![]()
Sure. If they shut down Gronk I'll come and congratulate you. And if the LOB don't shut down Gronk like you all just assume that they are, what are you gonna do?
RolandDeschain":sssqagjh said:I'd do the same thing; admit that Gronk bested the LoB.ExpatPack":sssqagjh said:RolandDeschain":sssqagjh said:Give us a stat sheet that Gronk will have to be under for you to come in here and admit that the LoB owns Gronk, then.ExpatPack":sssqagjh said:You think it's going to be that easy? LOL. I'm no Patriots fan but come on, take the blinders off. I certainly think the LOB can limit the Pats WRs, but Gronk is a whole 'nother animal.
Seriously, if we hold Gronk to fewer than X yards and X TDs, you'll praise the LoB. Gonna man up?![]()
Sure. If they shut down Gronk I'll come and congratulate you. And if the LOB don't shut down Gronk like you all just assume that they are, what are you gonna do?
Shutting down Gronk doesn't mean zero catches for the day. Tell us what he has to be limited to that you believe is fair, to be able to brag that the LoB shut Gronk down.