hugecanoli
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 1,591
- Reaction score
- 1,903
No need for a ring decoder since he says the same shit all the time but I found this interesting. could this actually be a Waldo callout?
Interesting Pete Speak….
- Thread starter hugecanoli
- Start date
WestCoastChippewa
Well-known member
Pete’s boring AF!
Maelstrom787
Well-known member
This is about as pissed as Pete will be publicly.
Sperrydogg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2023
- Messages
- 2,917
- Reaction score
- 1,852
He’s the master of only saying what he wants to say and not really answering anything
CallMeADawg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 3,148
- Reaction score
- 3,093
Yes that's a Waldron comment. He's talking about Waldron's responsibility. He also said on 710 that he doesn't call plays and provides coordinators with feedback after the series.
You know, directly disapproving this sites baseless claim that he calls plays and that his coordinators are "stooges".
Maelstrom787
Well-known member
He'd have no reason to criticize his own offense if he didn't believe what he was saying.
cymatica
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2014
- Messages
- 5,279
- Reaction score
- 4,157
I haven't seen anyone here suggest he calls plays.You know, directly disapproving this sites baseless claim that he calls plays and that his coordinators are "stooges".
CallMeADawg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 3,148
- Reaction score
- 3,093
They are so brainwashed from the propaganda against him that the guy isn't even allowed to publicly criticize direct elements of the offense without people wondering if what he said is true.
He literally just said what lots of fans have said after watching the game.
CallMeADawg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 3,148
- Reaction score
- 3,093
hox
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,620
- Reaction score
- 2,383
Thanks for sharing the tweet. Yes, he is calling out Waldron here (without putting him on blast). It is as clear as day.
The primary task at hand is what is he going to do about it.
CallMeADawg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 3,148
- Reaction score
- 3,093
Or maybe he's doing the easier thing. Telling the truth about the problems that are plain as day to see. Why does it always have to be a conspiracy around here?
CallMeADawg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 3,148
- Reaction score
- 3,093
He also said in his presser that the improvements start with him.
CalgaryFan05
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2016
- Messages
- 3,103
- Reaction score
- 3,397
This is the second time I've heard this.
Who knows? Maybe it is Waldo? I'm firmly coming to the belief that it's Pete that's neutering the OC's -
But I've also never heard him say shit like this either. And he said it pre and now post game. Said it after the Rams game.
This isn't: "The indicators are indicating the indications" Pete speak. I've never really heard him callout anything like this before. It's usually sunny days. And it's odd that it's almost verbatim what I said in the 'time to throw/TE/Geno' thread.
I'm torn. History tells me the problem is Pete. This shit tells me that Waldo got stupid and is now not listening to orders, or not getting it. I've been ranting about TE sets since the beginning of the season.
Coach sees it too? That's one on Waldo. IMO.
TheLegendOfBoom
Well-known member
It doesn’t look like Waldron is going to last and will probably not be back next season.
The problem with this is Carroll’s record isn’t stellar with offensive coordinators, he’s had a lot of OC’s during his tenure here and a lot of them has shared one commonality:
prolong periods of time of very bad offense
If it’s so many coordinators sharing this trait, the root common denominator is Carroll.
If Carroll does give full permission to do whatever the OC wants to do, does the OC have everything they need to be successful?
With the numerous coordinator changes, it makes me feel wonder, why are Seattle offensive coordinators so bad under Carroll??
I probably wouldn’t want to be OC under Carroll, honestly.
There’s something in that Seattle offense water that is not serving well for any OC that coaches under Carroll.
No matter if Carroll claims he does not have his fingerprints in the offense…
I’ll somewhat give the benefit of the doubt cause I do not think Geno is a great QB and whatever Waldron is trying to do has a short ceiling because Geno is struggling mightily right now.
The problem with this is Carroll’s record isn’t stellar with offensive coordinators, he’s had a lot of OC’s during his tenure here and a lot of them has shared one commonality:
prolong periods of time of very bad offense
If it’s so many coordinators sharing this trait, the root common denominator is Carroll.
If Carroll does give full permission to do whatever the OC wants to do, does the OC have everything they need to be successful?
With the numerous coordinator changes, it makes me feel wonder, why are Seattle offensive coordinators so bad under Carroll??
I probably wouldn’t want to be OC under Carroll, honestly.
There’s something in that Seattle offense water that is not serving well for any OC that coaches under Carroll.
No matter if Carroll claims he does not have his fingerprints in the offense…
I’ll somewhat give the benefit of the doubt cause I do not think Geno is a great QB and whatever Waldron is trying to do has a short ceiling because Geno is struggling mightily right now.
CallMeADawg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 3,148
- Reaction score
- 3,093
Shotty was fine.
cymatica
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2014
- Messages
- 5,279
- Reaction score
- 4,157
Post an example. I've seen plenty of posts saying he meddles in the offense and the gameplan. As far as actual playcalls, nope.
Good one.
