MANUNITED23
New member
Earl Thomas is my choice.
RolandDeschain":42xo0559 said:Interesting point of view, HawkFan72. Can you explain how being exceptional at man coverage is a "system position"? It seems to me like it's kind of the opposite. A lot of corners can't play man very well, or better than above average.
HawkFan72":a4wgzs6q said:Earl Thomas.
I hate to say it, but CB is a system position for Carroll. He can plug anyone in there who fits his system and they will do well. For example, look at all the no-name CBs who played for him at USC and look how many CBs have suddenly found success playing for us.
Did anyone notice a significant drop-off when Browner was out? No, because all the guys on the team fit Carroll's system and they can perform at a high level in it.
Sherman is our best CB, and there would be somewhat of a drop-off if he were gone just because he fits Carroll's system so PERFECTLY, but it would not be devastating.
Thomas, however, plays a very critical position in Carroll's defense and would be harder to replace. It's why Carroll went after a safety in the 1st round of his first draft (remember there were rumors that he wanted Eric Berry with his first pick, but he was gone before we took Okung) and why he has never drafted a CB before round 4.
RolandDeschain":22v0rhed said:While I did vote for Earl, Earl himself ALSO benefits from knowing it's very unlikely that either corner will get burned. It allows Earl more freedom, too; kind of a mutually increasing benefit between the corners and Thomas.
Just thought I'd throw that out there. You wouldn't see Earl crashing into the line of scrimmage as often or as quickly if we had two average corners.
Snohomie":25kyazac said:RolandDeschain":25kyazac said:While I did vote for Earl, Earl himself ALSO benefits from knowing it's very unlikely that either corner will get burned. It allows Earl more freedom, too; kind of a mutually increasing benefit between the corners and Thomas.
Just thought I'd throw that out there. You wouldn't see Earl crashing into the line of scrimmage as often or as quickly if we had two average corners.
I'm not sure I agree. We have great corners (although Browner has been up-and-down), but when they get burned, the often get burned badly because they don't have the same recovery speed as other corners and/or are playing too aggressively. Meaning, even if they cover their man most of the time, the times they don't hurt a lot.
I do agree with you as the offense marches down the field. Once the short field starts acting as a defender, then ET really starts to benefits from the huge physical corners.
White Knight":d90uhrys said:Thomas is the straw that stirs the drink on our defense. Great safety play is much less replaceable than great corner play.
After Irving's interception Irving went over and thanked Thomas for calling the wheel route on the presnap read and Irving jumped in the space to where the RB was going and picked it off. Clemons never saw him dropping in the hole.
Not ours. That's why Earl is so special.DavidSeven":ax6dkm3d said:An opposing team can avoid a single-high safety and still run a reasonably good offense.