chet380":k4obd0y6 said:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?
We could have Penny much later.
Seanhawk":2hxvu26z said:chet380":2hxvu26z said:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?
We could have Penny much later.
People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.
Seanhawk":1miqbk7b said:chet380":1miqbk7b said:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?
We could have Penny much later.
People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.
rjdriver":3k518itj said:Seanhawk":3k518itj said:chet380":3k518itj said:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?
We could have Penny much later.
People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.
There is though. Philly traded down at 32!
We could have given Baltimore 27 for whatever they gave Philiy and still got Penny!
Quite literally since 2013 they have done a terrible job of judging value.King Dog":2c0fmjiv said:Seanhawk":2c0fmjiv said:chet380":2c0fmjiv said:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?
We could have Penny much later.
People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.
I used to agree with this, but I no longer trust our FO to make these decisions. They think they're smarter than everyone else who evaluates draft talent. Hasn't really worked out much lately.
rjdriver":2zg1pscp said:Seanhawk":2zg1pscp said:chet380":2zg1pscp said:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?
We could have Penny much later.
People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.
There is though. Philly traded down at 32!
We could have given Baltimore 27 for whatever they gave Philiy and still got Penny!
Care to explain the logic here?rjdriver":113swoky said:Seanhawk":113swoky said:chet380":113swoky said:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?
We could have Penny much later.
People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.
There is though. Philly traded down at 32!
We could have given Baltimore 27 for whatever they gave Philiy and still got Penny!