No insult was intended to anyone. I started writing the post before your post appeared. I tend to be slower and deliberate. I edited the post and took stuff out before I posted it. Thus the post certainly wasn't 'aimed' at you.
To me it doesn't matter how much a copy of the Mona Lisa costs. It's still just a copy. Ironically a fake Mona Lisa with blonde hair, big tits, and a nice smile is probably cheaper than a good copy of the Mona Lisa. Some people are happy with higher quality fakes, and that's fine. Other opinions are equally valid. My standards are lower and money is tighter.
Some more off-topic stuff was removed before posting.
I quoted you but by no means did I intend what I said to be or taken as “personal”.
My curiosity is pure, I have a legitimate on field helmet and a couple “replicas” that were gifted to me.
There is a huge difference in quality (very obvious).
My point/question was more about this particular helmet being “replica” quality similar to what I already have vs maybe a legitimate helmet that was labeled as replica to help eliminate liability.
I saw “display helmet” when I glanced at the description, if it’s there I didn’t notice “replica “
No big deal, was just hoping for a bit of clarification if anyone knew.
I’d consider paying that price for a legitimate helmet, probably not for something along the lines of the “replicas” I already have.