SoHo9erFan":3tf1a4t8 said:
cc83"]
Kyle Williams is equivalent to Baldwin and this forum seems to think Baldwin is a formidable receiver. So yeah using your logic it makes sense. And Kyle has great hands as a receiver. I can't recall him dropping a pass. Sure, he muffed some crucial punts, but that is not an indictment on his receiving skills.
In what world is Kyle WIlliams the Equivalent of Doug Baldwin? This statement is beyond a stretch.
Williams has a whopping 461 receiving yards, 4TD's in 4 years. His best stats (2011) was 20 catches for 241 yards and 3 TD's. That' not exactly groundbreaking. That comes to 1.4 catches per game, for just 18.9 yards a game played in his 2 years he's played (2010 was basically a redshirt year). Pretty pedestrian.
2011- 13 games, 20-Catches, 241- Yards, 3- Td's, 12.0-avg.
2012 11 games, 14- Catches, 212- Yards, 1- Td's, 15.1- avg. 1- Fumble
Meanwhile Doug Baldwin in BOTH his years in the league has far outperformed:
2011 16 games, 51- catches, 788 - yards, 4- Td's, 15.5- Avg.
2012 14 games, 29- catches, 366- yards, 3- TD's, 12.6- avg.
I thought a better comparison for Williams might have been Golden Tate, whose take a few years to get going as a productive player, But after looking at the stats, that's not close either.
Golden Tate
2010 11 games, 21-catches, 227 yards, 0 TD's, 10.8 Avg.
2011 16 games, 35- catches, 382 yards, 3 TD's, 10.9 avg, 1 fumble
2012 15 games, 45- catches, 688 yards, 7 TD's, 15.3 avg, 1 fumble.
Mario Manningham is a much better player than Kyle Williams and he's merely average.