Good Explanation As To Why It Was Time

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,320
Reaction score
3,201

The title of the article is a bit misleading but shares a few things that were obvious.

Pete's scheme and philosophy was stale. Players playing out of position with no plan to remedy it. Being good enough to have winning records, but never good enough to sniff a Super Bowl for years.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,434
Reaction score
12,654
Location
Delaware
It's really, really hard to not immediately click off of that article when it includes "bad run defense" as a carry-over from Ken Norton Jr.

We had been a top-5 defense in yards per carry allowed for 2 years consecutively when Norton was fired.

I hate when articles like this are so comfortable with being so inaccurate. It's exactly how complete falsehoods become accepted narratives in fanbases.

The story is this. They completely tore it down after 2017, and by 2020, the run defense was certifiably elite using Carroll classics like the hybrid Bear front. After Norton was fired and Carroll went away from his greatest hits in an effort to modernize with Hurtt and Desai, it went to shit. That context is very, very important.

That being said, sure. It was time if he wasn't gonna fire Hurtt or Waldron.
 

Hawknight

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
3,273
Reaction score
2,103
Location
Here and there

The title of the article is a bit misleading but shares a few things that were obvious.

Pete's scheme and philosophy was stale. Players playing out of position with no plan to remedy it. Being good enough to have winning records, but never good enough to sniff a Super Bowl for years.
Teams like the Rams figured us out a long while ago. It's never a good approach to come at the same team twice a year with the same philosophies....you're going to get your arse handed to you one way or another.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
24,959
Reaction score
5,100
Location
Anchorage, AK
It's really, really hard to not immediately click off of that article when it includes "bad run defense" as a carry-over from Ken Norton Jr.

We had been a top-5 defense in yards per carry allowed for 2 years consecutively when Norton was fired.

I hate when articles like this are so comfortable with being so inaccurate. It's exactly how complete falsehoods become accepted narratives in fanbases.

The story is this. They completely tore it down after 2017, and by 2020, the run defense was certifiably elite using Carroll classics like the hybrid Bear front. After Norton was fired and Carroll went away from his greatest hits in an effort to modernize with Hurtt and Desai, it went to shit. That context is very, very important.

That being said, sure. It was time if he wasn't gonna fire Hurtt or Waldron.
That is the one thing about fan site articles that can be annoying. They often are written to make a specific point and can often be written using more memories And opinions than pure facts.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,372
Reaction score
2,285
Location
Sammamish, WA
It's really, really hard to not immediately click off of that article when it includes "bad run defense" as a carry-over from Ken Norton Jr.

We had been a top-5 defense in yards per carry allowed for 2 years consecutively when Norton was fired.

I hate when articles like this are so comfortable with being so inaccurate. It's exactly how complete falsehoods become accepted narratives in fanbases.

The story is this. They completely tore it down after 2017, and by 2020, the run defense was certifiably elite using Carroll classics like the hybrid Bear front. After Norton was fired and Carroll went away from his greatest hits in an effort to modernize with Hurtt and Desai, it went to shit. That context is very, very important.

That being said, sure. It was time if he wasn't gonna fire Hurtt or Waldron.
Agreed. Stopping the run was not an issue with KNJ led defense. The problems defending the run started when Hurtt became the DC
 

TheLegendOfBoom

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
3,860
Reaction score
2,308
Location
Westcoastin’
Things we know:

1. Carroll, not a good Xs and Os coach
2. Carroll, hires coordinators, that are also pretty awful Xs and Os coordinators (look at the NFL for the Carroll’s tree, what coach is still good/relevant)
3. Players also know this

I’m so happy we have changes in coaching staff on both sides of the ball.

Seattle actually has a chance and hope now!
 

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
21,038
Reaction score
13,053
Location
Astoria, OR
"It’s refreshing getting someone new in here - different coaching style, different playing style."

Wow, that's a real straight up, pernicious, fatal blow of shade right there...

200
 

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
21,038
Reaction score
13,053
Location
Astoria, OR
As much as I loved Pete and what he brought to our team and us fans, it was quite obvious he was past his expiration date when it came to his stale defensive philosophies/schemes and stubbornness/over-loyalty to coordinators who had no business being in their roles, certainly for as long as some of them were.

If your division rivals know what you are going to do because of your refusal to change your base schemes, that's a problem.
 

Hawkinaz

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
2,136
Reaction score
1,558
Location
Henry County, Virginia
Things we know:

1. Carroll, not a good Xs and Os coach
2. Carroll, hires coordinators, that are also pretty awful Xs and Os coordinators (look at the NFL for the Carroll’s tree, what coach is still good/relevant)
3. Players also know this

I’m so happy we have changes in coaching staff on both sides of the ball.

Seattle actually has a chance and hope now!
I agree with Carroll not being a good Xs and Os coach he relies on elite players playing a basic system it reminds me of the 90s Cowboys, you will know what’s coming but good luck stopping it, once the LOB got older and skills started to fade it was the beginning of the end

PC always hired yes men as coaches which I felt was his down fall
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
40,591
Reaction score
2,919
Location
Roy Wa.
Which is why I was disappointed he didn't hire Chow, his offense was more aggressive and down field, but at USC the both of them clashed. Marshawn had one sound bite that told me all I needed, he asked Pete can we score some more ? or something to that effect. The whole what's your deal thing I believe stuck with Pete about running up points, so much he throttled back with a lead almost all the time.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,434
Reaction score
12,654
Location
Delaware
So you would be satisfied with Pete still being the coach with yet another set of coordinators?
Depends entirely on which coordinators and why.

I'm tired of acting like two 9-8 years after trading Russ is some sort of tortuous hell. It's petulant.

The man was winning more games than he was losing while simultaneously making grown men write like Sylvia Plath on the internet about how their existence as a fan is a cruel and horrid fate. Anyone who can win that much at their floor deserves their vision heard for the ceiling. Not really that unreasonable to anyone willing to step back for a moment and look at the full picture.
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
1,823
Reaction score
1,426
Location
Bournemouth, UK
Norton Jr. was fired after the 2021 season. That season the Seahawks were #17 in rushing defense by yardage, #31 in passing defense by yardage, and #28 in overall defense by yardage. Opponents moved the ball down the field almost at will. The Seahawks were #31 in 1st downs conceded, 1 ahead of last place. The Seahawks defense was extremely tough in the red zone. Got to give them credit for that. #11-T in points conceded.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,434
Reaction score
12,654
Location
Delaware
Things we know:

1. Carroll, not a good Xs and Os coach
2. Carroll, hires coordinators, that are also pretty awful Xs and Os coordinators (look at the NFL for the Carroll’s tree, what coach is still good/relevant)
3. Players also know this

I’m so happy we have changes in coaching staff on both sides of the ball.

Seattle actually has a chance and hope now!
Hope is a mental construct. Seattle had hope before. Even teams in purgatory improve.

Don't believe me? Ask the John Harbaugh Ravens, who had a worse skid than us for nearly a decade before re-entering contention. Nearly the exact same situation.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,924
Reaction score
2,552
As much as I loved Pete and what he brought to our team and us fans, it was quite obvious he was past his expiration date when it came to his stale defensive philosophies/schemes and stubbornness/over-loyalty to coordinators who had no business being in their roles, certainly for as long as some of them were.

If your division rivals know what you are going to do because of your refusal to change your base schemes, that's a problem.
Completely agree with this post.

Pete WAS a great coach but his style didn't keep up with changes going on around the league.

I genuinely thought he was still able to be a great coach but his whole schtick had become tired and predictable. Truly thought he thought so too and he wasn't no longer genuinely competing.

Once again I hope this thread doesn't turn into another dancing on Pete's grave thread as has become somewhat of the norm here lately.

It was time for change, change has been made. It's time to move on and allow Pete to ride off in the sunset .
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top