I cannot believe that this has gone on for 4 pages.
You guys should have just ignored this just based upon the author's grammar and spelling (referencing "controvertible opinion").
I mean, what the hell does that mean?
Pffft!
I think he was trying to say, "controversial opinion".
His whole argument is lame and uninformed. And then on top of it, he cannot punctuate worth $#!+. He said:
"I know I know. Everyone is claiming Harvin to be the "messiah" of this franchise but, I disagree. I think we have a better player here already. His name is Golden Tate. What can't Tate do at this point that Percy can? For some reason, I cannot see it.
Punt returns?
Bubble screens?
Yac?
In my controvertible opinion. I say jettison Harvin to save cap and, let our TRUE and proven stars be the next BIG THING.
Seriously, what has Harvin done that Tate cannot do?"
Let's re-punctuate this correctly:
"I know, I know. Everyone is claiming Harvin is the "messiah" of this franchise. But, I disagree. I think we have a better player here already. His name is Golden Tate. What can Percy do, at this point, that Tate can't? For some reason, I cannot see it.
Punt returns?
Bubble screens?
Yac?
In my controversial opinion, I say jettison Harvin to save cap and let our true and proven stars be the next big thing.
Seriously, what has Harvin done that Tate cannot do?"
The argument is still uninformed but, at least now it is grammatically correct.
LOL