DYLcurry59
Member
hawksfansinceday1":1d53zdmk said:Sadly, this WILL happen.Hasselbeck":1d53zdmk said:After getting gouged by Forte and being down one of their better linebackers, I predict Bevell will go 5 WR for 90% of the game.
FTFY
hawksfansinceday1":1d53zdmk said:Sadly, this WILL happen.Hasselbeck":1d53zdmk said:After getting gouged by Forte and being down one of their better linebackers, I predict Bevell will go 5 WR for 90% of the game.
They think we are going to pound it with the run and read option, so I will outwit them and throw bubble screens all day long.....maniacal laugh.Hasselbeck":3bpqendm said:After getting gouged by Forte and being down one of their better linebackers, I predict Bevell will go 5 WR for 90% of the game.
hawksfansinceday1":3hv6gopf said:IMO, our team is not gonna win in Cincy in week 5 but will in this week.Hawk-Lock":3hv6gopf said:SoulfishHawk":3hv6gopf said:Get over it, it was a joke. :roll: 4 is more realistic.
Overreact? I have been on here all day saying that even if they go 0-2, they still will win 10 or 11 games.
I gotta remember this :sarcasm_off:
The script is already out.
Hawks start out 0-2. Run the table until week 13 where they lose back-to-back games to the Vikings and Ravens, and then run the table to finish the year as 12-4.
peachesenregalia":2i8tos8q said:We're going to win this football game.
Wartooth":59f1nry8 said:The Bears rushed for 189 yards against the Packers...
The Hawks my well go over 300 next week!
Sure they have Rogers...
But they did nothing to improve that plodding defense of theirs!
If the Hawks can run the ball, eat up the clock, keep Rogers on the sidelines...
They can beat them again!
peachesenregalia":2nv6qa7w said:We're going to win this football game.
seahawk Dan":17ywxvvz said:Wartooth":17ywxvvz said:The Bears rushed for 189 yards against the Packers...
The Hawks my well go over 300 next week!
Sure they have Rogers...
But they did nothing to improve that plodding defense of theirs!
If the Hawks can run the ball, eat up the clock, keep Rogers on the sidelines...
They can beat them again!
I agree sick and tired of people not giving the Hawks any chance .
SO you expect him to do the exact opposite of the logical? Amazing...Hasselbeck":2hdtxdba said:After getting gouged by Forte and being down one of their better linebackers, I predict Bevell will go 5 WR for 90% of the game.
Aaron Rodgers last interception at home was three years ago.strat1080":34l3s8ro said:seahawk Dan":34l3s8ro said:Wartooth":34l3s8ro said:The Bears rushed for 189 yards against the Packers...
The Hawks my well go over 300 next week!
Sure they have Rogers...
But they did nothing to improve that plodding defense of theirs!
If the Hawks can run the ball, eat up the clock, keep Rogers on the sidelines...
They can beat them again!
I agree sick and tired of people not giving the Hawks any chance .
Nick Foles threw for 297 yards against Seattle. Aaron Rodgers may go for 400 next week. Not a whole lot of logic in that post. Its not like Matt Forte is some bum or something. The Seahawks definitely have a chance and it should be a good game but don't kid yourself. Neither defense looked particularly good on Sunday. Seattle had a hard time slowing down Nick Foles with very little offensive weaponry at his disposal. It will be a tougher task slowing down the league MVP on his own turf. A place where he has averaged nearly 40 PPG over the last few years. And he has been particularly sharp in Sunday Night games.
Well they might as well not even play the game. Hopefully Pete will call in the forfeit today so they can start game planning for their next opponent.ptisme":35a8ldwt said:Aaron Rodgers last interception at home was three years ago.strat1080":35a8ldwt said:seahawk Dan":35a8ldwt said:Wartooth":35a8ldwt said:The Bears rushed for 189 yards against the Packers...
The Hawks my well go over 300 next week!
Sure they have Rogers...
But they did nothing to improve that plodding defense of theirs!
If the Hawks can run the ball, eat up the clock, keep Rogers on the sidelines...
They can beat them again!
I agree sick and tired of people not giving the Hawks any chance .
Nick Foles threw for 297 yards against Seattle. Aaron Rodgers may go for 400 next week. Not a whole lot of logic in that post. Its not like Matt Forte is some bum or something. The Seahawks definitely have a chance and it should be a good game but don't kid yourself. Neither defense looked particularly good on Sunday. Seattle had a hard time slowing down Nick Foles with very little offensive weaponry at his disposal. It will be a tougher task slowing down the league MVP on his own turf. A place where he has averaged nearly 40 PPG over the last few years. And he has been particularly sharp in Sunday Night games.
The Packers last loss at home, with Aaron Rodgers at quarterback, was over three years ago.
That is why they are substantial favourites going into this game. But the one thing I would be slightly concerned with is if Green Bay somehow were to lose this game, at home, the game they have been thinking about all off season, what happens then?ptisme":17gkrlh3 said:Aaron Rodgers last interception at home was three years ago.strat1080":17gkrlh3 said:seahawk Dan":17gkrlh3 said:Wartooth":17gkrlh3 said:The Bears rushed for 189 yards against the Packers...
The Hawks my well go over 300 next week!
Sure they have Rogers...
But they did nothing to improve that plodding defense of theirs!
If the Hawks can run the ball, eat up the clock, keep Rogers on the sidelines...
They can beat them again!
I agree sick and tired of people not giving the Hawks any chance .
Nick Foles threw for 297 yards against Seattle. Aaron Rodgers may go for 400 next week. Not a whole lot of logic in that post. Its not like Matt Forte is some bum or something. The Seahawks definitely have a chance and it should be a good game but don't kid yourself. Neither defense looked particularly good on Sunday. Seattle had a hard time slowing down Nick Foles with very little offensive weaponry at his disposal. It will be a tougher task slowing down the league MVP on his own turf. A place where he has averaged nearly 40 PPG over the last few years. And he has been particularly sharp in Sunday Night games.
The Packers last loss at home, with Aaron Rodgers at quarterback, was over three years ago.
That is why they are substantial favourites going into this game. But the one thing I would be slightly concerned with is if Green Bay somehow were to lose this game, at home, the game they have been thinking about all off season, what happens then?
Hawk-Lock":39ffro55 said:My main fear is that Rodgers will attack our weakspot: Dion Bailey and Carry Williams. Would not surprise me if he doesn't throw towards Sherman's side. I think Cary and Bailey will get exposed in this game, I just hope our offense can put up enough points. I think this will be a higher scoring affair.
strat1080":2jxr4l99 said:Hawk-Lock":2jxr4l99 said:ptisme":2jxr4l99 said:Vegas watched GB's run defense against Chicago...Hawk-Lock":2jxr4l99 said:Opening lines for our week 2 game has GB as -3 with some heavy juice. This line will likely move up by the weekend.
Very interesting. Based on the line, I think Vegas is giving us more of a chance than I thought.
Their offense was far from spectacular too. Very unRodgers-esque for him to throw for less than 200 yards, especially against Chicago who he usually smokes. I didn't watch any of the game, but I'm going to guess he misses Jordy.
That had more to do with their inability to stop Matt Forte. The Packers were moving the ball well and scoring in the red zone. They were just limited in possessions. He did throw for 3 TDs and post a 140 passer rating and put up 31 points on the road. The Packers offense actually looked very good. It was their defense that let them down. Mostly tackling fundamentals. It seems like they were in the right position to stop the run but whiffed on tackles. They were missing 2 of their 3 starters on DL though due to suspension.