Lmao....I agree!!!godawg":1rs7olry said:These guys are thinking, "good thing that Chancellor dude just got surgery..."
MizzouHawkGal":d0069bfu said:Why are some comparing Richardson to DeSean? He is noticeably bigger even before he's on an NFL regimen.
Exactly. Silky smooth and way more than Mike Wallace. We are getting RW style WR's finally.jlwaters1":10xpwqcb said:MizzouHawkGal":10xpwqcb said:Why are some comparing Richardarson to DeSean? He is noticeably bigger even before he's on an NFL regimen.
I agree, Desean is 5-10, 175 (165 during the draft), Richardson is 6-0, 180 currently (listed on Seahawks.com) I think it's safe to assume after he get's a year of development from NFL strength coaches and a proper diet he could be near 190. I think he reminds me more of a young Marvin Harrison -- Even P-Rich's WR's coach on KJR made that comparison.
I'm really excited for both rookie WR's.
jlwaters1":2yufjhn4 said:MizzouHawkGal":2yufjhn4 said:Why are some comparing Richardson to DeSean? He is noticeably bigger even before he's on an NFL regimen.
I agree, Desean is 5-10, 175 (165 during the draft), Richardson is 6-0, 180 currently (listed on Seahawks.com) I think it's safe to assume after he get's a year of development from NFL strength coaches and a proper diet he could be near 190. I think he reminds me more of a young Marvin Harrison -- Even P-Rich's WR's coach on KJR made that comparison.
I'm really excited for both rookie WR's.
You shush you.TwilightError":3bf7um2q said:jlwaters1":3bf7um2q said:MizzouHawkGal":3bf7um2q said:Why are some comparing Richardson to DeSean? He is noticeably bigger even before he's on an NFL regimen.
I agree, Desean is 5-10, 175 (165 during the draft), Richardson is 6-0, 180 currently (listed on Seahawks.com) I think it's safe to assume after he get's a year of development from NFL strength coaches and a proper diet he could be near 190. I think he reminds me more of a young Marvin Harrison -- Even P-Rich's WR's coach on KJR made that comparison.
I'm really excited for both rookie WR's.
I foresee a 4 game suspension here... :lol:
MizzouHawkGal":1vh3m5l8 said:Why are some comparing Richardson to DeSean? He is noticeably bigger even before he's on an NFL regimen.
Makes sense. Thanks. Interestingly JS mentioned they had a list of WR's that came into the NFL at 170ish lbs when deciding to draft him. It included a bevy of seriously good WR's some HOFer's.HansGruber":rqgthzyq said:MizzouHawkGal":rqgthzyq said:Why are some comparing Richardson to DeSean? He is noticeably bigger even before he's on an NFL regimen.
If you're talking about ability to take hits, it's because people will generally repeat whatever the rest of the herd is saying, whether it makes sense or not. Physically, DeSean and Richardson are very similar. DeSean has not had durability issues in the NFL. But apparently, speed comparisons are valid, while everything else is not.
It is rather hilarious that a lot of people were complaining about Richardson being too skinny and saying we should have picked Lee instead. Yeah... really.
MizzouHawkGal":1vqf0jzz said:Makes sense. Thanks. Interestingly JS mentioned they had a list of WR's that came into the NFL at 170ish lbs when deciding to draft him. It included a bevy of seriously good WR's some HOFer's.