Seattle Person
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 3, 2021
- Messages
- 482
- Reaction score
- 554
I choose to think about D.K's situation like this:
1) If you cut D.K, you are only going to save $10m for next year's cap. Not really an incentive in my opinion -- especially since you have to either draft his replacement or sign his replacement. Chances are, neither options will actually replace D.K.
2) If you extend D.K, you can actually have a manageable cap hit for 2024 and 2025. You can structure all sorts of ways but you can open up at least $15m if his cap hit is in the teens in the first year. You give yourself easy outs on the back end of his contract.
3) So I choose to lower his cap hit for 2025 and keep his production. This actually makes the team better. You can open money to sign others and you keep a good WR already. D.K just turned 27 years old in Dec. He's still freaking young and will be on his third contract. Doing this will allow you just need to add another WR as opposed to finding multiple WRs.
1) If you cut D.K, you are only going to save $10m for next year's cap. Not really an incentive in my opinion -- especially since you have to either draft his replacement or sign his replacement. Chances are, neither options will actually replace D.K.
2) If you extend D.K, you can actually have a manageable cap hit for 2024 and 2025. You can structure all sorts of ways but you can open up at least $15m if his cap hit is in the teens in the first year. You give yourself easy outs on the back end of his contract.
3) So I choose to lower his cap hit for 2025 and keep his production. This actually makes the team better. You can open money to sign others and you keep a good WR already. D.K just turned 27 years old in Dec. He's still freaking young and will be on his third contract. Doing this will allow you just need to add another WR as opposed to finding multiple WRs.