hawk45":1lfxaokv said:
"Me and my family come first" <> "I have to protect my family" IMO. The former is easily interpreted as a desire to maximize income for his family and is disconnected from any notion that his family is in jeopardy. The latter is quite firmly suggestive that there is some jeopardy to his family if his pile of gold isn't as large as it could be.
The implicit jeopardy is what people react to negatively. Both the "feed" formulation and the "protect" formulation center on jeopardy.
I think you framed the "protect" statement in a way more friendly to your argument, but IMO the court should uphold a ruling of semantics here
:lol: :lol:
:2thumbs: :2thumbs: :2thumbs: :2thumbs: :2thumbs:
Just as a point of clarification, he never said "protect my family". His exact quote which is being misquoted was:
"I just gotta protect myself. At the end of the day, me and my family, that's the first thing."
And you're right that I really don't read "protect" in that sentence as implying the "imminent danger" usage of the word. He's not saying he's in imminent danger.
Rather, he's talking about a contract, and "protect" is being used in the
contractual sense of the word (i.e. a contract "protecting" both parties).
The takeaway from that sentence, which MAKES A LOT OF SENSE in my opinion (whereas the imminent danger interpretation doesn't make any sense) is he's saying that he wants a contract with long-term guarantees and one that pays him at a fair market value (i.e. he wants the protection of an extension, and doesn't want to do a team discount).
The "end of the day, me and my family, that's the first thing" addendum to thought was simply clarifying that he's not interested in doing management favors or taking a team friendly deal -- i.e. me and my family are the negotiating party where my interests lie.
People can of course like that or not or find it in poor taste for him to come and say that or not, but turning it into "I need 15 million a year instead of 10 million a year because my kid's are starving at 10 million" just lacks a factual basis in reality, IMO.