UK_Seahawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
- Messages
- 4,469
- Reaction score
- 513
This thread has reminded me of a British comic Stewart Lee who went looking for comments about him online. Nsfw due to strong language.
johnnyfever":228g7s9o said:I probably would.
Think about it, what if there was a very active online forum discussing your company, and specifically about how each of the employees were performing, and their value.
There are several posters over the last few years that are obviously ridiculously defensive about a player or coach to a fault.
I can think of a couple off the top of my head that are pretty blatant, but I'm guessing there are others that are better at hiding their identity.
What do you guys think?
Uncle Si":8178gt7w said:Somehow this innocuous thread has turned into yet another recess name calling battle.
The thread title was fairly specific. Keep your posts on topic and stop attacking each other.
No, I do not. I think the PR or marketing department likely does, however.johnnyfever":2yjxehbj said:We aren't discussing coaching philosophy. We are discussing dopplegangers and members of the seahawk organization and whether you think they read and comment (or have representatives do it) in the largest seahawks forum in the world.
Much like many sports stars, celebrities, businesses and organizations hire companies that specifically deal in the online presence and reputation of their clients.
Take ACfan for example. Joined as soon as he became a seahawk and was basically a cheerleader for Collins. Even after an atrocious showing he would be pumping him up in various threads, calling for patience, talking him up etc. It always seemed ver suspicious to me. I am a huge Bennett fan, but am not blind to some of his weaknesses and bad games. Same goes for wilson. Love the guy, but he does have some things to work on.
Do you think they come here siouxhawk?
Siouxhawk":cbsvtiee said:No, I do not. I think the PR or marketing department likely does, however.
As has been said, I could see the players keeping up to date with Facebook, Twitter and Instagram by and large. There's probably a ton of them that don't even know .Net exists. But it's marketing and PR's job to keep fans informed and help the team make money, so I'm sure they peruse all the sites to leave no stone unturned.johnnyfever":18sglk0p said:Siouxhawk":18sglk0p said:No, I do not. I think the PR or marketing department likely does, however.
Why?
FlyingGreg":14b1jzra said:Back in the earlier days of Net, I was informed by a Seahawks player that he read an article I did about him (it was a supportive piece, so he appreciated it)... I asked him if he browsed .Net and he said, "yes, some of us like to lurk in there..coaches too." Don't ask, I won't name said player even though he is long retired.
I don't know if any current players do...
But come on, Anthony! HAS to be Ciara, right?? Only a spouse or a family member could be that insanely one-sided and immovable about a player.![]()
PS Not picking on you Anthony! ... your passion is admirable.
Siouxhawk":32rdke8x said:That last comment was weird. Why would anyone on a Hawks fan site bust someone's balls for having a deep admiration for the best quarterback this franchise has ever known? And while I'm on the subject, I think it's strange that some feel it's their duty or something to be over-the-top critical of Russ. Sure he has some minor flaws, but the way he plays the game and his devotion to his team can't be touched.
Yeah and you're a Niners fan.mistaowen":y9c0r5f2 said:Siouxhawk":y9c0r5f2 said:That last comment was weird. Why would anyone on a Hawks fan site bust someone's balls for having a deep admiration for the best quarterback this franchise has ever known? And while I'm on the subject, I think it's strange that some feel it's their duty or something to be over-the-top critical of Russ. Sure he has some minor flaws, but the way he plays the game and his devotion to his team can't be touched.
Probably because you're a Vikings fan who became a Seahawks fan when Bevell and Tarvaris left.