Smelly McUgly
New member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2013
- Messages
- 4,282
- Reaction score
- 0
What I'm saying is that if they win two of three, it ultimately does not matter which two of three they win, whether or not you have to be nervous during the Rams game.
Smelly McUgly":3eiuinv5 said:What I'm saying is that if they win two of three, it ultimately does not matter which two of three they win, whether or not you have to be nervous during the Rams game.
:229031_shrug: Whatever. Obviously, YOU don't want it to come to that. Actually I'd prefer it didn't but I have no control over that. Frankly, if I have "must win" games on the schedule, I prefer them be played at the CLink anyway. The Giants game, we're still playing on house money.Polaris":booh8046 said:sutz":booh8046 said:Actually, we MUST win 2 of the next 3. Which two is irrelevant.PS. Don't patronize to me about seeding. Seattle will look to be in the number one seed up until the moment the Niners tie with us. Then we're the wildcard. Immediately. Need to make sure that does NOT happen and that means we MUST win the next two.
You don't want it to come down to the last game of the seaon. At least I hope you don't.
TwistedHusky":2zkjlcqz said:That was a winnable game.
It was lost due to some of our players letting the other team lure them into penalties and bad play because they let their emotions take control of them (A double edged sword since we know those same players use emotion-filled play style to turn the team into a buzzsaw at home when needed).
It was also lost because of complete inability of our OC to adjust his playcalling to the realities of what was working on the field.
And it was lost because we didn't have Browner and Thurmond, since for whatever reason - whatever mistake either one made likely led to this loss.
Any one of those, they might have been able to overcome but all combined? Too much.
Hopefully we can make up for this by playing well in NY, but I cannot shake the feeling this game had of being a Detroit or a Miami. Games that we lost last year that either one ended up making a HUGE difference for us.
Hopefully I am wrong, but one thing is clear. They blew it. The 49ers were doubting themselves before the game, not even sure they could win. Now the Seahawks left the gate open, listen to the 49ers now. They now believe they can win and that was half of the battle.
Polaris":2rutiffx said:It's called "margin of error". If something bad can happen, you have to assume it probably will. The best way to stop that is to win the next two games and remove any doubt.
Me too.Nearpost":iptufvlh said:I feel sorry for what is about to happen to The Giants.
Realism by definition is expecting the mean or median outcome; what you are describing is pessimism. You probably avoided the term because it has a negative connotation, but every realistic sports fan out there is only momentarily rational while they are wavering from optimism to pessimism to optimism.Polaris":1qpql5ht said:When you deal with playoff scenarios, assuming the worst case scenario IS being realistic.You aren't being realistic. You're assuming worst-case scenario. Big difference. Quit being a chicken little.
AgentDib":lvdbasji said:Realism by definition is expecting the mean or median outcome; what you are describing is pessimism. You probably avoided the term because it has a negative connotation, but every realistic sports fan out there is only momentarily rational while they are wavering from optimism to pessimism to optimism.Polaris":lvdbasji said:When you deal with playoff scenarios, assuming the worst case scenario IS being realistic.You aren't being realistic. You're assuming worst-case scenario. Big difference. Quit being a chicken little.
The annoying thing about optimism or pessimism is not when fans catch either, but when they insist on coughing all over realism with it to try to spread their germs. How the Seahawks perform on the field has nothing to do with whether fans were in the appropriate "mindset" or not, and the importance the players put on a game is not dictated by the importance that fans put on that game.
Polaris":wkwo8lmg said:Sarlacc83":wkwo8lmg said:Polaris":wkwo8lmg said:No, I am being realistic. I am not whining and saying "woe is me; all is lost" and frankly I dislike the notion that some are trying to present here that I am.
Perhaps I should have said, "Going ON from here". I am not giving up. Far from.
However, if you don't understand how important this game was and how much Seattle really did need to win it.
When you have a chance to step on your rival's throat and SEIZE the division and a first round bye YOU TAKE IT. As it is, we've given San Fran far too great a reprieve in the division and gave up far, far too much of our cushion.
Just the way it is. Now we deal with it....but be honest about it when dealing with it.
PS. Don't patronize to me about seeding. Seattle will look to be in the number one seed up until the moment the Niners tie with us. Then we're the wildcard. Immediately. Need to make sure that does NOT happen and that means we MUST win the next two.
You aren't being realistic. You're assuming worst-case scenario. Big difference. Quit being a chicken little.
Of for the love of mike.... :roll:
When you deal with playoff scenarios, assuming the worst case scenario IS being realistic. There is no "chicken little" about it. I won't feel confortable until we win two more (if we win two more).
volsunghawk":2vhxttic said:That's where you demonstrate that you ARE being a chicken little.
Let me get this straight. We're automatically assuming that the 49ers are going to win out, but yet we refuse to assume that Seattle will win 2 out of the @NYG, Arizona, St. Louis combination?
Tampa is a better team than the Giants right now, even if they're a game behind them in the standings. I see no logic in assuming a win for SF but not doing the same for Seattle in that comparison.
St. Louis versus Atlanta... I'll give you that one.
But Arizona. The 49ers have to go on the road, and while Arizona may not be a daunting place to play, the 49ers will still have to deal with being on the road. We get the Cardinals at home. That's advantage Seattle.
Polaris":kiyouad6 said:The Niners have had and will have no troubles with Arizona. Book it. OTOH, 'Zona has often been a thorn in our side, and you know the Cards (and Rams) would just love to deny a Division title to us if they can.
Largent80":chsdphjk said:To me this game was one we could afford to lose, however, I am thinking the Vagiant game will be a must win.
This loss may be a harbinger of good rather than bad as we haven't had one for over a month and a half. It is a realization that you need to keep playing hard for 4 quarters.
MidwestHawker":2b9mma84 said:Polaris":2b9mma84 said:The Niners have had and will have no troubles with Arizona. Book it. OTOH, 'Zona has often been a thorn in our side, and you know the Cards (and Rams) would just love to deny a Division title to us if they can.
Niners on the road at Arizona are a stone cold lock that we can already book. Seahawks at home against Arizona is far more likely to be a nailbiter.
Ladies and gentlemen...realism.