BocciHawk":2mubugss said:
Mad Dog":2mubugss said:
Lol. It's funny how a couple anecdotes convince people to ignore oodles of scientific data.
Vaccination and antibiotics are the greatest human health advances ever and people still question them. I wish some anti-vaxxers could spend some time in the 17th century to gain some perspective.
Or go visit Samoa, where the death toll from measles keeps rising because of idiot anti-vaxxers:
17th Century? Yes, you should definitely go back there, and gain some perspective from the lack of sanitation and the many medical practices that today are known to be both useless and dangerous. A little leeching or maggot treatment was the least of the issues. Samoa? Well, a complex situation has been instantly reduced to a drive-by attack designed to cut off thought and discussion, and demonize any who disagree with the attacker. Mob rule, anyone?
As I said, there are certain things that have taken on the elements of a religion, and vaccines have gotten to the point of being pushed as a black and white religious issue, of "ALL vaccines ALWAYS good, ANY questioners bad" with name-calling and economic and physical attacks on so-called "deniers", and simply questioning the ALL and/or ALWAYS part, leads one to be attacked.
Non-vaccine pharmaceutical drug manufacturers can be sued in the regular court system. However, there is a special "Vaccine Court" that has been set up where the *taxpayers* pay out on account of the pharmaceuticals for VACCINE INJURY cases. This article is about as balanced as one will find in corporate media:
https://www.salon.com/2018/12/23/federa ... s_partner/ A less pharmaceutical friendly article can be found here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news ... -climbing/
The Salon article includes this statement: "CDC is unlikely to rescind that advice: the agency reported that 80,000 Americans died of the flu in 2017" However, that number is highly, highly questionable, and combines flu deaths with pneumonia deaths." However, according to the National Vital Statistics System in the U.S., for example, annual flu deaths in 2010 amounted to just 500 per year -- fewer than deaths from ulcers (2,977), hernias (1,832) and pregnancy and childbirth (825)" from
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence- ... 61442.html Hmm, so one source says 80,000 died from "the flu" in a year (2017) in the US, but another reliable source says 500 died from the flu in 2010? A 160-fold increase in "flu deaths" in 7 years? There is something seriously wrong with this picture and the numbers being pushed at us.
Instead of religious name calling, can we use a little critical thinking, and analysis of motives and awareness of financial incentives? Take a look at this CDC presentation and the purpose it has, "Recipe for Fostering Public Interest
and High Vaccine Demand"
http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/medi ... /Nowak.pdf
So the CDC motive is to "create demand". Hmm, who profits? Why, many persons who are associated with the CDC and in positions to influence policy, that's who!
https://www.lawfirms.com/resources/envi ... ccinations
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news ... ne-market/
I'm instantly suspicious of anything being pushed in a PR compaign where the primary mode of persuasion is to "scare them into compliance" along with demonizing and name-calling any opposition. That's a tactic various religions have used for millenia, because it works on a lot of people.
The money behind the ALL-VACCINES-ALWAYS-GOOD public psyop has been effective to the point that anyone who questions the "ALL" and "ALWAYS" can expect to be attacked and name-called ("Denier" and much worse) by those who have been influenced by these well-funded PR campaigns, to the point of taking it on as a holy war believing they have some "scientific" religious high ground, and failing to question the money and influence that are present in the system. For what it's worth, the risks of influenza are primarily to older people, age 65 and up, NOT to young, healthy mosty 20-something professional athletes.
Follow the money.