ivotuk
Well-known member
Dallas failed to play prevent and got beat.
Nope. Their idea is to rush 4 was a good one. Their problem wasn't scheme its talent. They have one of the worst secondarys in the league, THAT is the reason they lost on defense.ivotuk":2w2r98s5 said:Dallas failed to play prevent and got beat.
The Radish":3atc6jpw said:What part of that game I saw Dallas had no defense for anything.
I figured that must be the case when Romo throws for 500 yards and they lose.
:roll:
C-Dub":36g8pf2q said:Durham is slow. No reason he should burn a CB. Is absurd to think prevent would have kept Detroit from winning with that Dallas secondary.
But it also gives the QB more time to throw and find a different WR is Durham was covered. One extra crappy DB in coverage won't win a game.ivotuk":2008ieoa said:C-Dub":2008ieoa said:Durham is slow. No reason he should burn a CB. Is absurd to think prevent would have kept Detroit from winning with that Dallas secondary.
You are correct, Durham is slow, so if Dallas would have been in prevent, there is no way he could have gotten past the db.
McGruff":2snn1t8f said:The Stafford TD at the end was one of the coolest and most ballsy individual plays I've ever seen.
ivotuk":3amce4o2 said:The Radish":3amce4o2 said:What part of that game I saw Dallas had no defense for anything.
I figured that must be the case when Romo throws for 500 yards and they lose.
:roll:
He only threw for 208 yards, the defense did their part by getting 4 turn overs.
People complain when the Seahawks play prevent, but there is a reason for that, and it's why we are 6-1 :th2thumbs:
ivotuk":6brtivpc said:People complain when the Seahawks play prevent, but there is a reason for that, and it's why we are 6-1 :th2thumbs: