Dallashawksfan
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2020
- Messages
- 336
- Reaction score
- 213
Schneider can’t let go his bad picks
Or he's hoping McDonald can work some magic with himSchneider can’t let go his bad picks
Of courseOr he's hoping McDonald can work some magic with him
And it’s crazy. I actually have always liked Clowney but his actual numbers aren’t really impressive.For as much as some like Clowney and how much they dislike Taylor, Clowney has never had a better sack season total than Taylor has.
Clowney is a decent player. He is a force to be reckoned with in run defense and as a pass rusher, he still gets good pressure despite his sack numbers. He just has always had a hard time closing the deal on sacks. As a roleplayer, Clowney is a solid asset -- he may never be a top tier pass rusher, but he does everything well.And it’s crazy. I actually have always liked Clowney but his actual numbers aren’t really impressive.
I think maybe that one viral hit he had in college always stuck in my mind, and that’s what I see when I think of him.
And that was on a contract year for Taylor. He kind of reminds me of a young Bruce Irvin. (Calm down. I said kind of)Now, Taylor on the other hand is the opposite of Clowney. His game is an absolute mess in every way. He's a liability in every situation other than rushing the passer on an obvious pass rushing situation. Even his pass rushing isn't as good as the numbers indicate. Taylor has utility as a situational pass rusher, but as a 3 down player he is god awful.
He's our new gunner on special teams.Who's Darryl Taylor?
Who's Darryl Taylor?
A pick from a couple years back that we just re-signed. In the future if you're unsure google is your friend![]()
I wouldn't say that. Irvin was good at setting the edge, his pass rushing skills are what was very hit or miss. I'd say that Irvin was more similar to Clowney than anything. Perhaps in his rookie year we could've said that about Irvin, but when he was switched to LB he became an all around player that could do everything well, but nothing great.And that was on a contract year for Taylor. He kind of reminds me of a young Bruce Irvin. (Calm down. I said kind of)
I’d spell his name right if he actually played well enough to have me look it up!Does Google help if you don't know how to spell a players name right? Spoiler alert: It's Darrell Taylor.
Up until now he has been the ultimate looks like Tarzan plays like Jane.Ya hes trash...just filler I guess?
I think if anything this is understating the differences, and these players are a prime example of how sack statistics are just one minor component to the overall job requirements. Clowney is a good DE who executes his responsibilities very well, while Taylor is strictly a maximum alignment pass rusher who does a terrible job with his assignments.Clowney is a decent player. He is a force to be reckoned with in run defense and as a pass rusher, he still gets good pressure despite his sack numbers. He just has always had a hard time closing the deal on sacks. As a roleplayer, Clowney is a solid asset -- he may never be a top tier pass rusher, but he does everything well.
Now, Taylor on the other hand is the opposite of Clowney. His game is an absolute mess in every way. He's a liability in every situation other than rushing the passer on an obvious pass rushing situation. Even his pass rushing isn't as good as the numbers indicate. Taylor has utility as a situational pass rusher, but as a 3 down player he is god awful.
Hes like the de version of kelly Jenning. He gets to qbs but cant tackle them just like kelly could stick with receivers but was useless in preventing them from catching passes.Taylor's been a good pass rusher. He's just awful in run defense. I actually think he's a good fit in Macdonald's defense as a rotational player because the scheme will help hide his deficiencies.