MidwestHawker
New member
-The Glove-":31qa08lr said:Maybe I was a little harsh with the beginning of my last post.
You weren't.
-The Glove-":31qa08lr said:Maybe I was a little harsh with the beginning of my last post.
No way he gets Atkins money. 8 million/3 years is more realistic.ivotuk":2iloumz9 said:I think Michael can get close to Geno Atkins money. 5 years 54.75 million. Geno got a 15 Million dollar signing bonus which won't be happening here.
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bre ... -deal.html
More power to him, he's looking out for his family. He's been a great player, a team player, all year, unselfish, and very entertaining on the radio.
I'll miss the guy, but we already have Percy Harvin making that kind of money. (6 years 64 million)
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seah ... cy-harvin/
Thank you Michael Bennett! :th2thumbs:
MagHawk":izg3c710 said:I don't think he is claiming he wants to break the bank - just that he thinks he deserves to be paid well.
After the year he had, and the part he played in our championship run - I think he is correct in that.
lsheldon":120di7zi said:I'm curious how Bennett feels about being placed on waivers by Seattle in 2009 right before the start of the regular season. I would be surprised if that still didn't hurt his feelings a bit.
Snakeeyes007":1hja8v8d said:If Bennett were two years younger, I could see a bigger challenge to resigning him. However, he will be turning 29 before the start of next season, which most likely places him in the 3-4 year contract range, similar to what we gave Clemons. Since Avril is a younger version of Clemons, I expect the Hawks to make a business decision, cut Clem, and re-sign Bennett to a deal near the Clemons contract. Bennett offers us more versatility along the defensive line, and the Hawks may be eyeing cutting Red as well if he won't restructure, which means we may need a bigger DE to play the Elephant role as well. Bennett is about 60 lbs. lighter than Red, and not as fast as Clemons, but the versatility he provides in playing multiple positions neither Clem nor Red has. Remember, Pete and John like highly versatile players.
Unless there is a desperate team out there that offers Bennett a Kruger type contract (overpaying to lure a player to a poor team), I expect Bennett will be back with us again next year.
Next year's rushing lineup (not including draftees) projection:
Starting LE - Bennett or Bryant
Starting RE - Avril
Rotation DE's - Irvin, Mayoya, Schofield
morgulon1":24sgaui6 said:lsheldon":24sgaui6 said:I'm curious how Bennett feels about being placed on waivers by Seattle in 2009 right before the start of the regular season. I would be surprised if that still didn't hurt his feelings a bit.
Who was the GM at the time?
MizzouHawkGal":2fbxtsh2 said:No way he gets Atkins money. 8 million/3 years is more realistic.ivotuk":2fbxtsh2 said:I think Michael can get close to Geno Atkins money. 5 years 54.75 million. Geno got a 15 Million dollar signing bonus which won't be happening here.
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bre ... -deal.html
More power to him, he's looking out for his family. He's been a great player, a team player, all year, unselfish, and very entertaining on the radio.
I'll miss the guy, but we already have Percy Harvin making that kind of money. (6 years 64 million)
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seah ... cy-harvin/
Thank you Michael Bennett! :th2thumbs:
99% sure she meant $8m/year for three years.ivotuk":37d4h0j7 said:And I'm not sure you worded your post correctly, 8 million over 3 years? Careful because some people are just looking for a post to ridicule, it's sad but true.
jblaze":1xfuf6pz said:ivotuk":1xfuf6pz said:I think Michael can get close to Geno Atkins money. 5 years 54.75 million. Geno got a 15 Million dollar signing bonus which won't be happening here.
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bre ... -deal.html
More power to him, he's looking out for his family. He's been a great player, a team player, all year, unselfish, and very entertaining on the radio.
I'll miss the guy, but we already have Percy Harvin making that kind of money. (6 years 64 million)
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seah ... cy-harvin/
Thank you Michael Bennett! :th2thumbs:
11mil a year??? ROFL.
Who are you going to replace Red with?Hawk Strap":3k8qwuh2 said:Cut Red and give that money to Bennett, problem solved (better)
-The Glove-":3rxcf3tf said:Maybe I was a little harsh with the beginning of my last post. For that, I apologize. But go read the post of yours I quoted earlier and the post above. You didn't say any of those things. What's with the tattooing Seahawks on the forehead comment? You said he "showed no appreciation". I explained he clearly has/did. He deserves to think about his family but you hope he doesn't get any good deals so he has to come back begging to JS? He didn't diss the team and I have no idea where you're getting that from.
getnasty":37yeehy2 said:Cut Clem give that money to Bennett. Problem Solved.
themunn":34grzlh3 said:How does this have 7 pages of comments?
SacHawk2.0":24fdwz8a said:themunn":24fdwz8a said:How does this have 7 pages of comments?
It's the off season.
I would cut Red and Clem if it meant keeping Bennett, his versatility almost lets you carry one less DLineman. My guess is that Marshawn, Mebane are gone after this year and I won't be surprised if Percy was gone after this year (depending on his health and contract).Tical21":1azxz9oc said:I wish it were as easy as cutting Clem to sign Bennett. It washes this year, fine. But what impact does it have in the next couple of years? We are past the point of playing with even money. We've got to come up with 40 million per year for Sherm, Earl, and Russell. If we want to make that happen, we need to start making sacrifices now. Percy's number is 10ish also. We've got Mebane, Lynch, Kam also. That is like 70 million for seven players. And we're going to sign Bennett to pretty big money? What about Okung? If there is a way, I'm all for it. To me, the reality is that we had some extra cap this year to add a few pass-rushers, knowing full well there was no way we would be able to afford anything like it again.