Be Afraid: The 49ers Are Coming

[RichNhansom]

Niner troll quote:
All I see is Pete Caroll f**king over his team again in the playoffs just like last year when he tried to ice the kicker and going for it on a 4th down instead of kicking a field goal, LOL and it will be even more funnier if he did it in the superbowl too making them 0-2, if they actually make it there this season.

Really? Your bashing Carroll for calling a time out when Harbaugh went away from the running game at the 4 yard line and went to a subpar red zone QB to try and win and that was after the running game got you back in the game and in position to win. If you want to talk about moronic coaching moves that one your coach owns is currently the shinning example for the whole NFL of what ignorant coaching looks like AND THAT WAS IN THE DAMNED SUPER BOWL.


Another Niner troll quote:
Those were the same scrub teams that gave you guys the fits earlier in the season. Texans were so close to beating you guys then we blew them out, titans even gave you guys the fits, then we blew them out. Niners and seahawks have both played the same teams basically and yet the media is crowning them and even most seahawks fans are crowning themselves the SB champs.

All off season Niners fans were saying Seattle would suck and be lucky to be 500 in large part because we won't be sneaking up on teams. In part they were correct. Teams have brought that absolute A game against Seattle all season long just like Tenn and Houston. The problem is that they have expended so much energy and effort to game plan for us they are spent the next week, just like your team was and several playoff caliber teams, Houston, Tenn and 9ers have all completely melted the following week. Not just lost but were absolutely blown out in all three cases.

As for us crowing ourselves super bowl champs. You have to be completely delusional to make that statement if you have been on any Niner boards. You would think the Niners had won the last five super bowls and they fully expect this one is already in the bag and that is after getting curb stomped ( not once but the last two times they played) by the team currently in the lead in the division with an easier schedule ahead.

Do we believe we are good enough to make it to the super bowl? Absolutely but why shouldn't we? Give me one good reason a Seahawks fan shouldn't consider THIS TEAM THIS YEAR as a favorite to get there?

As for previous history. The older the event the less relevance it has on the current team. I respect what the 9ers of the 80's and early 90's accomplished. I respected that team a ton but since then things have changed and the more recent you look at both teams the more it favors the Seahawks. Since the Seahawks joined the division we have been the most dominant team in it and no we haven't won a super bowl (though 98% of the country believes we should have) but neither have you and yes even with you making the super bowl last year because right now we are in the lead and have recently brutalized you with the current rosters on both teams. Even two years ago is much less important than now because the teams were significantly different but the last two games are or should be a good measure of the quality of each squad.

 

[RichNhansom]

49er fans are delusional again because their team is revelent again. However, you should wait until the Seahawks lose again before getting too giddy... until then you're just a wildcard team.

Btw, 49er fans... (2012) I think a 11-5 team that was the 4th youngest team in the NFL starting or depending on a bunch of rookies including a rookie QB and rookie MLB to contribute is better than 11-4-1 team...who had more experience and had no rookies make any starts.

And last but not least... if the 49ers lost Staley, Goodwin, Davis, and TE Davis for accumaltive of 15+ starts... you guys would suck, horribly.

You can also say if they had to play normal 10am starts like the rest of the division or if they had to play Atlanta at 10am like we did they would not have made the super bowl and if fact we would have been the #2 seed with them traveling to DC to lose players on that crap field and then watch them get demoralized in Atlanta the next week to an early start. Unless the NFL changed the start time for them like they have for 5 or 6 of their east coast games the last couple years.

The Niners need to be thanking the NFL for helping them out because without those scheduling advantages they are going nowhere.

 

[seahawks08]

When we play there, if the fans make noise, I will complain that they forfeit their home games

 

[MizzouHawkGal]

But very quietly, under the shade of the 24/7 Seattle Seahawks media machine, the 49ers have strung together four straight wins and a 5-2 record.

The Seahawks are the story. I know. They’ve got the division lead, the big personalities, and the big hits. They deserve all the media attention they’re receiving. But don’t sleep on the defending champs. They’ve got their stingers back.

They’re playing the brand of football we thought they’d play back in August. They don’t want you to notice. Trust me, they’d rather you not think of them until January. But the defending NFC champions — quietly, far away from the national spotlight — are the hottest team in the NFC.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Week ... isco-49ers

So, just to get this correctly... we're in the national spotlight and not Denver and Kansas City?What are they going to say after we win tomorrow? We aren't better because we only won 3 in a row?

 

[kearly]

The toughest opponent they've had in the last 5 games was Arizona, and that game was played in San Francisco. I'm sure their DVOA went up today, but going into this game it was only +16% for the season, tied with the Carolina Panthers. Seattle is at +34%, second in the NFL.

I've thought all along that SF was a 12-4 team, but only because of their schedule. I think they get beat handily in New Orleans, and I think Seattle kicks their butts in the rematch as well. They'll win all the rest of their games. They are masters of beating bad teams, but have looked very beatable against top competition. In a lot of ways, they remind me of the 2012 Texans. Still have to respect them because of the schedule inequality and because they are more consistent week to week than Seattle is, but Seattle is a better team, and it's not even that close right now.

 

[Gap Filler]

you posted the quotes correct? i wrote that in response to the OP, whether they were your quotes or not?

So you're responding to someone who won't read this comment section but putting the quotes of his article on me, the OP. Thats just dumb. If you have something to say to the writer go to the link.

I challenge you to read the article for once and respond to the article. Get it smart guy?

 

[Sports Hernia]

you posted the quotes correct? i wrote that in response to the OP, whether they were your quotes or not?

So you're responding to someone who won't read this comment section but putting the quotes of his article on me, the OP. Thats just dumb. If you have something to say to the writer go to the link.

I challenge you to read the article for once and respond to the article. Get it smart guy?

Uh Oh, ninnies troll temper tantrum in 3.....2.......1...........

 

[Throwdown]

Only thing that matters now is we beat their ass once already this season, and we'll do it again, then the 9er fans will go quiet again.

 

[Pak40.]

The toughest opponent they've had in the last 5 games was Arizona, and that game was played in San Francisco. I'm sure their DVOA went up today, but going into this game it was only +16% for the season, tied with the Carolina Panthers. Seattle is at +34%, second in the NFL.

I've thought all along that SF was a 12-4 team, but only because of their schedule. I think they get beat handily in New Orleans, and I think Seattle kicks their butts in the rematch as well. They'll win all the rest of their games. They are masters of beating bad teams, but have looked very beatable against top competition. In a lot of ways, they remind me of the 2012 Texans. Still have to respect them because of the schedule inequality and because they are more consistent week to week than Seattle is, but Seattle is a better team, and it's not even that close right now.

Well if SF sucks so bad who have you beaten? Seems to me the only team Seattle has beaten with a winning record is SF, who apparently sucks but only has a good record because they play crappy teams.

 

[MizzouHawkGal]

The toughest opponent they've had in the last 5 games was Arizona, and that game was played in San Francisco. I'm sure their DVOA went up today, but going into this game it was only +16% for the season, tied with the Carolina Panthers. Seattle is at +34%, second in the NFL.

I've thought all along that SF was a 12-4 team, but only because of their schedule. I think they get beat handily in New Orleans, and I think Seattle kicks their butts in the rematch as well. They'll win all the rest of their games. They are masters of beating bad teams, but have looked very beatable against top competition. In a lot of ways, they remind me of the 2012 Texans. Still have to respect them because of the schedule inequality and because they are more consistent week to week than Seattle is, but Seattle is a better team, and it's not even that close right now.

I guess I don't need to post anything further given you basically posted my thoughts except for the DVOA thing.Why should it rise against a historically bad opponent?

 

[MizzouHawkGal]

The toughest opponent they've had in the last 5 games was Arizona, and that game was played in San Francisco. I'm sure their DVOA went up today, but going into this game it was only +16% for the season, tied with the Carolina Panthers. Seattle is at +34%, second in the NFL.

I've thought all along that SF was a 12-4 team, but only because of their schedule. I think they get beat handily in New Orleans, and I think Seattle kicks their butts in the rematch as well. They'll win all the rest of their games. They are masters of beating bad teams, but have looked very beatable against top competition. In a lot of ways, they remind me of the 2012 Texans. Still have to respect them because of the schedule inequality and because they are more consistent week to week than Seattle is, but Seattle is a better team, and it's not even that close right now.

Well if SF sucks so bad who have you beaten? Seems to me the only team Seattle has beaten with a winning record is SF, who apparently sucks but only has a good record because they play crappy teams.

Later today the answer would be....one more than you. :49ersmall:

 

[Laloosh]

The toughest opponent they've had in the last 5 games was Arizona, and that game was played in San Francisco. I'm sure their DVOA went up today, but going into this game it was only +16% for the season, tied with the Carolina Panthers. Seattle is at +34%, second in the NFL.

I've thought all along that SF was a 12-4 team, but only because of their schedule. I think they get beat handily in New Orleans, and I think Seattle kicks their butts in the rematch as well. They'll win all the rest of their games. They are masters of beating bad teams, but have looked very beatable against top competition. In a lot of ways, they remind me of the 2012 Texans. Still have to respect them because of the schedule inequality and because they are more consistent week to week than Seattle is, but Seattle is a better team, and it's not even that close right now.

Well if SF sucks so bad who have you beaten? Seems to me the only team Seattle has beaten with a winning record is SF, who apparently sucks but only has a good record because they play crappy teams.

:angry017:

 

[Gap Filler]

you posted the quotes correct? i wrote that in response to the OP, whether they were your quotes or not?

So you're responding to someone who won't read this comment section but putting the quotes of his article on me, the OP. Thats just dumb. If you have something to say to the writer go to the link.

I challenge you to read the article for once and respond to the article. Get it smart guy?

Uh Oh, ninnies troll temper tantrum in 3.....2.......1...........

Good call. We both root for the Seahawks.

I'm starting to wonder if people on this board like to discuss or just troll. For all the people who write how 49er fans troll this "NFL Board" I think the Seahawks fans troll more. Look at the very first page. Dummies putting GIF's and pictures of animals. Its an attitude of arrogance and lack of ability to actually read an article and discuss it like a knowledgeable fan.

 

[Laloosh]

This thread needs more derailing... preferably with gifs and pictures of animals.

 

[Throwdown]

I also wanna know why 49er fans feel the need for for vindication from Seahawks fans? Why do you guys care so much about what we think?

 

[Laloosh]

I also wanna know why 49er fans feel the need for for vindication from Seahawks fans? Why do you guys care so much about what we think?

That doesn't look like gifs or animal pictures.

 

[Gap Filler]

This thread needs more derailing... preferably with gifs and pictures of animals.

You fit right in with everyone who can't discuss articles

 

[Laloosh]

This thread needs more derailing... preferably with gifs and pictures of animals.

You fit right in with everyone who can't discuss articles

Yeah, well you're mean.

After seven pages, I'm not sure there is much to discuss. SF managed to avoid falling off the deep end. The game is more than a month away, they still have to play Carolina and New Orleans before they get us. Not to mention go on the road against an AZ team that competed with them.

Let's see how they do in that time before we start quaking in our boots.

 

[davidonmi]

we'll see, it'll come down to 3 games to decide it. Saints @ hawks hawks @ 9ers and 9ers @ saints, I would like to see it won outright and not on the 10th tiebreak down the list though

 

[Pandion Haliaetus]

The toughest opponent they've had in the last 5 games was Arizona, and that game was played in San Francisco. I'm sure their DVOA went up today, but going into this game it was only +16% for the season, tied with the Carolina Panthers. Seattle is at +34%, second in the NFL.

I've thought all along that SF was a 12-4 team, but only because of their schedule. I think they get beat handily in New Orleans, and I think Seattle kicks their butts in the rematch as well. They'll win all the rest of their games. They are masters of beating bad teams, but have looked very beatable against top competition. In a lot of ways, they remind me of the 2012 Texans. Still have to respect them because of the schedule inequality and because they are more consistent week to week than Seattle is, but Seattle is a better team, and it's not even that close right now.

Well if SF sucks so bad who have you beaten? Seems to me the only team Seattle has beaten with a winning record is SF, who apparently sucks but only has a good record because they play crappy teams.

Bro, I mean c'mon... seriously... honestly... duuuuuuuuuuude....

Seahawks beat:

0-0 Panthers team @ Carolina in a 10 a.m. start in 90+ heat and humidity. Say what you want about only scoring 12 points but the Panther's D is top 5 in the NFL. Not only do they have a killer front 7 but statistically they have one of the best secondaries this year.

1-0 49ers team @ Seattle on SNF. This was supposed to be payback for 42-13 but the 49ers lost 29-3 and the Seahawks left points on the board running the clock out in scoring position.

0-3 Jaguars team @ Seattle. Not much to say but this could have been a bigger blow out had Wilson not gave the Jaguars an easy 7 points off a turnover. After that play, Seahawks pretty much benched half their starters.

2-1 Texans team @ Houston in a 10 am start in 95 degrees of heat and humidity. Seahawks were without 4/6th of their best players on the O-line. Seahawks let the game get away from them in the 2nd QTR but held the Texans in check with goose eggs. Texans were also playing their best ball trying to bounce back off a thrashing they took in Baltimore. But with a little luck and a little skill plus a lot of moxie Seahawks overcame adversity and won a game they probably should have lost.

3-2 Titans team @ Seattle. This game is much closer than it looks because a 10 swing off a fumble from the backup holder. That doesn't happen every day... without it Seahawks win comfortably at 23-6.

3-3 Cardinals team @ Arizona. University of Phoenix as always been bugaboo for the Seahawks. A tough place to win. It didn't help it was also a Thursday night game sandwhiched as the 3rd road game of 4 total during a 5week span. Seahawks handled business and if it weren't for a couple of Wilson fumbles that gave the Cards access to 10 easy points... this game isn't close.

Seahawks lost:

to a 3-1 Colts team @ Indy. Another 10 am start, 2nd in a row. 2nd straight week without 4/6th of the O-line. And the Seahawks controlled much of this game and beat themselves with mental mistakes more than the Colts dominated the Seahawks. Cuz that didn't happen and the Colts also got tremendous help from the Refs that helped put them in lead. Like the Houston game but opposite, Seahawks gave away a game they should have won. Yet this lost still showed the Seahawks are capable of playing on the road vs a quality team and still be able to compete despite shooting themselves in the foot and getting jobbed by the refs on blatant occasions. Seahawks lost this game by 6. What happened to the 49ers in San Fran vs the Colts? Wasn't it like 27-7.

The 49ers loss differential in this season alone at 46 points is still more than the total differential of Seahawks losses dating back to the 2nd half of 2011. During that period, Seahawks lost 10 times by a total of only 43 points. Remember, this is a Seahawks team that is and was inexperienced, young, and relying on significant contributions by its youth compared to the 49ers teams.

In 2013, Seahawks aren't just getting scrub teams as the Seahawks only played 1 team that had a losing record at the time we played them. Most teams in the NFL wouldn't be 6-1 right now facing our schedule the way it was laid out plus our injury situation that took an average O-line and made it exceptionally worse. However, the fact still remains that most teams have had it "easier" in terms of schedule/injuries and yet aren't sitting at 6-1 on top of the NFC.