Aiyuk Requests a Trade

94Smith

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
997
It's a waste of time going back and forth about something everyone knows. Aiyuk is OVERRATED. The guy doesn't get double teamed as much as DK if at all and is a product of the system there. Teams don't fear him or game plan to stop him like they di DK.
That’s because Lockett is very mid now and on the wrong side of 30. It will be interesting to watch JSN in his second year
 

The Dirty Dozen Fan

Active member
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
110
Reaction score
60
I'm trying to understand all the frustration and trolling from this 94smith character. Do you think it's because 94 is their birth year so they don't have any personal memory of their favorite team lifting the Lombardi.
Maybe it's because like BA they know the window is closed and they want out.
Defensive end Justin Smith wore number 94. Bit of stumble for a first time post.
 

bileever

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 16, 2022
Messages
1,998
Reaction score
2,720
I think Aiyuk is an essential part of the 49ers' offense. McCaffrey's going to be in his 8th season in the NFL, so a lot of mileage there. Deebo's been dinged up. Kittle is still great, but he's 30 years old now. Aiyuk had a great season last year and is still on his way up.
 

SeaofGreen

Active member
Joined
Jul 23, 2024
Messages
118
Reaction score
157
Defensive end Justin Smith wore number 94. Bit of stumble for a first time post.

Defensive end Justin Smith wore number 94. Bit of stumble for a first time post.
More sarcastic than a stumble. Justin who...?
I don't care about any niners fans, players current or former or the #'s they wear/wore. I just look forward to watching them crumble because its the only thing that shuts up the whiner fans that I know of.
 

Lagartixa

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
2,152
Reaction score
3,737
Location
Taboão da Serra, SP, Brazil
How can a team with so many All Pro's and Pro-Bowlers continue to fall short of the mark?

I've been wondering for a while at what point Gold Diggers management and ownership will start to get impatient with the apparent inability of Little Shanny in the Big Hat to turn the best roster in the NFL over four or five of the last six seasons into a title. This year the Gold Diggers once again have what looks like the best roster in the league. And since Purdy is extension-eligible after this season, that could change a lot next season.

That's another interesting thing about the Gold Diggers over the next year or so. They could go two completely different ways with Purdy after this season. They could give him a huge extension and then have to give up depth and even possibly some really good starters to do so, or they could innovate and reject the "pay whatever the going rate is for top-of-the-market QBs" strategy that talking-head mediots insist is the only viable one. I could imagine a team like the Gold Diggers getting a huge haul for a year of control of a player like Purdy on a super-cheap contract and then continuing to have one of the best rosters in the league for some time. I just wonder if Little Shanny in the Big Hat would ever be capable of turning a decade of top-quality rosters into even a single title.
 

94Smith

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
997
I've been wondering for a while at what point Gold Diggers management and ownership will start to get impatient with the apparent inability of Little Shanny in the Big Hat to turn the best roster in the NFL over four or five of the last six seasons into a title. This year the Gold Diggers once again have what looks like the best roster in the league. And since Purdy is extension-eligible after this season, that could change a lot next season.

That's another interesting thing about the Gold Diggers over the next year or so. They could go two completely different ways with Purdy after this season. They could give him a huge extension and then have to give up depth and even possibly some really good starters to do so, or they could innovate and reject the "pay whatever the going rate is for top-of-the-market QBs" strategy that talking-head mediots insist is the only viable one. I could imagine a team like the Gold Diggers getting a huge haul for a year of control of a player like Purdy on a super-cheap contract and then continuing to have one of the best rosters in the league for some time. I just wonder if Little Shanny in the Big Hat would ever be capable of turning a decade of top-quality rosters into even a single title.
Do you ever consider that perhaps the success of the team contributes to the narrative that the team is full of probowlers and all pros and perhaps "little shanny in the big hat" has a big part to play in that success? The two entities work together, not completely apart in a vacuum. A good example is Deebo samuel. Not a lot of offensive coaches would use a WR in ways he is used. Garoppolo had pretty good success and stats with the 49ers, but completely collapsed on the Raiders. Your post seems to suggest that they win despite of him rather than in part because of him. The 49ers have rolled 5-8 different running backs through all with success. I doubt Purdy would look as good on a different team.

I've said this before, York is not going to move on from Shanahan no matter how many NFC championships nor superbowls he loses. He did that with harbaugh and the results were disastrous .
 

Fresno Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Messages
851
Reaction score
795
I don't view the whiners as a team that wins because of their offense. They win because of there defense. John lynch has had 5 years of drafting excellent defensive players each year. And adding probowlers in freagency. Make no mistake about it they are a defensive team. The offense only got really good when Cmack came.
 

94Smith

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
997
I don't view the whiners as a team that wins because of their offense. They win because of there defense. John lynch has had 5 years of drafting excellent defensive players each year. And adding probowlers in freagency. Make no mistake about it they are a defensive team. The offense only got really good when Cmack came.
You are making up facts to fit your narrative again. 2023 #2 offense, 2022 # 5 offense, 2021 #7 offense, 2020 - injuries year, 2019 #4 offense
 

Fresno Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Messages
851
Reaction score
795
You are making up facts to fit your narrative again. 2023 #2 offense, 2022 # 5 offense, 2021 #7 offense, 2020 - injuries year, 2019 #4 offense
It's easy to rank high when the defense gives the ball to offense at mid field. I'm no stat guy but I'm down here in California, and have seen alot of the whiners games they get shown every Sunday. And the defense stops everyone. Probably get the most 3 and outs in the nfl. I'm curious how those whiners offenses rated against the top defenses in the league and how many of those rankings were piled up against bad defenses. The Hawks and Cards have had bad defenses the last 2 years maybe even 3. That's 4 games each year against terrible defenses right there. That team has been know as a defensive team the last couple years. And the loses are not blamed on them.
 

94Smith

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
997
Can't take anyone serious who calls Lockett mid. But it's what I expect from 29er fans.
Tyler Locketts best years are behind him . His stats are fading like his hairline. He was the 31st ranked receiver in yards and 19th in receptions and 35th in TDs... not sure what I am missing?
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
6,495
More than a few film guys, scouts etc view him as a top 5 talent at the position in the NFL or in the conversation. I think the Niners being loaded limits his production but he’s a stud for sure
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
40,591
Reaction score
2,920
Location
Roy Wa.
Tyler Locketts best years are behind him . His stats are fading like his hairline. He was the 31st ranked receiver in yards and 19th in receptions and 35th in TDs... not sure what I am missing?
You say that but having 4 receivers that can actually play moves the bubble around from year to year, Metcalf, JSN, Bobo all getting reps, also using the TE and RB's more takes the pressure off Lockett needing to be the only Go Too guy, this year we are deeper yet adding Laviska Shenault Jr., Dareke Young to the mix. Eskridge well we will see if he is the odd man out, he has been non existent on the IR almost his whole career.

This may extend his career actually taking some of the pounding off him so he can be a Bobby Ingrum type guy that is third down impactful in the future.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,930
Reaction score
2,365
Tyler Locketts best years are behind him . His stats are fading like his hairline. He was the 31st ranked receiver in yards and 19th in receptions and 35th in TDs... not sure what I am missing?

Your missing a lot. Subscribers beware.

Subjects of stat herding become like programed zombies.

Bottled subscribers of someone else's making.
 

94Smith

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
997
Your missing a lot. Subscribers beware.

Subjects of stat herding become like programed zombies.

Bottled subscribers of someone else's making.
I don't know, he's never been a big numbers guy. He has little to no yards after catch and always has. I don't think I would have ever ranked Lockett in the top 10 receivers in any of the years he has played. I've never been "wowed" by his play. DK though is a different story
 

Latest posts

Top