5-12

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
6,916
Reaction score
1,107
I am hoping for a 2 win season. No sarcasm.

Bad enough to get a decent shot for a QB, not terrible enough to set a new record for being terrible.
 

notyou

Active member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
571
Reaction score
128
TwistedHusky":23fn627r said:
I am hoping for a 2 win season. No sarcasm.

Bad enough to get a decent shot for a QB, not terrible enough to set a new record for being terrible.
Seahawks being bad don't get them a good pick due to the Adams trade.
 

HawkStrong

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
1,278
Reaction score
461
Location
In your PMs
notyou":mxerny7n said:
TwistedHusky":mxerny7n said:
I am hoping for a 2 win season. No sarcasm.

Bad enough to get a decent shot for a QB, not terrible enough to set a new record for being terrible.
Seahawks being bad don't get them a good pick due to the Adams trade.


Incorrect.
 

Hawknballs

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
837
five wins on a team with a bad defense, currently no pass rush, currently no QB, currently a sketchy offensive line, a safety who can't play safety, and running backs who are always hurt?

That sounds generous.
 

notyou

Active member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
571
Reaction score
128
HawkStrong":zwal1wfi said:
notyou":zwal1wfi said:
TwistedHusky":zwal1wfi said:
I am hoping for a 2 win season. No sarcasm.

Bad enough to get a decent shot for a QB, not terrible enough to set a new record for being terrible.
Seahawks being bad don't get them a good pick due to the Adams trade.


Incorrect.
I guess you are correct. Looks like they start having 1st rounders again in 2023.
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,136
Reaction score
1,071
Location
Taipei
notyou":i1vmxqd0 said:
HawkStrong":i1vmxqd0 said:
notyou":i1vmxqd0 said:
TwistedHusky":i1vmxqd0 said:
I am hoping for a 2 win season. No sarcasm.

Bad enough to get a decent shot for a QB, not terrible enough to set a new record for being terrible.
Seahawks being bad don't get them a good pick due to the Adams trade.


Incorrect.
Did they somehow get their 1st round picks back from the Jets?

No but they did from Denver
 

Hawknballs

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
837
first rounders from 21 and 22 were traded for adams. So one more draft being hamstrung by that bone head decision (which I bone-headedly supported at the time)
 

notyou

Active member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
571
Reaction score
128
Smellyman":362tm9uo said:
notyou":362tm9uo said:
HawkStrong":362tm9uo said:
notyou":362tm9uo said:
Seahawks being bad don't get them a good pick due to the Adams trade.


Incorrect.
Did they somehow get their 1st round picks back from the Jets?

No but they did from Denver
Denver's 1st rounders have nothing to do with Seattle's record.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,185
Reaction score
1,602
Location
Spokane
Cyrus12":1pvmn1f2 said:
I agree its wise to tank next year. Get that next franchise qb.


“Suck for Luck?” C’mon, man!! We know that’s not a valid strategy.
 
OP
OP
E

Elemas

New member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
7
Considering the QB options this year, I’m ok with tanking. If they pick Matt Corral, I’m going to be very pissed off.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
6,916
Reaction score
1,107
The worst thing you can do is get a mediocre QB.

Pairing that with our mediocre coach is not a recipe for success.

And remember, we have to fill cupboards in multiple positions.

We need 2 solid years of high draft picks across the rounds to somehow recover.
 
OP
OP
E

Elemas

New member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
7
Agree Husky.

Not to mention, our division appears to be locked in for the next 2-3 years. How competitive do we think we were going to be?
Tear it down…get the picks, Rise Up again.
 
Top