Jazzhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2009
- Messages
- 10,266
- Reaction score
- 123
The bookies had it exactly right. Dang.
+3...I just realized
- Thread starter Jazzhawk
- Start date
CrimsonWazzu
New member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2012
- Messages
- 415
- Reaction score
- 0
Down to the total as well at 42.5
HOLLYWOOD
New member
The odds makers have done well this year thus far. Lines and over unders have been real tight.
formido
New member
They got lucky. Before this game, Wilson was 24-5 against the spread, including preaseason and play-offs.
Source: http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/co ... ory/24239/
...which notes his record ATS as 19-5 and he's won each game ATS since, until today.
Source: http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/co ... ory/24239/
...which notes his record ATS as 19-5 and he's won each game ATS since, until today.
seahawksTopGear
New member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2012
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 0
The spread did not take into account that we had 4 backups in our five man line. The game would not have been so tight with max in there
I see a lot of people say we had three missing. That is not right.
Lt. Backup mcquistan
Lg. Backup
C. Backup
Rg. Our most innexperienced starter
Rt. Backup.
I see a lot of people say we had three missing. That is not right.
Lt. Backup mcquistan
Lg. Backup
C. Backup
Rg. Our most innexperienced starter
Rt. Backup.
BAllenHawk
New member
LG is staryer
Axx
New member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2012
- Messages
- 2,091
- Reaction score
- 0
after the injuries my bookie slid it down to Seattle -1.5
nsport
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2009
- Messages
- 1,531
- Reaction score
- 23
Axx":1493fdcs said:
Yep - it opened at -3. Damn perfect... then slid based on injuries. I was surprised the we were still favored after it was confirmed that we'd be missing 3 OL starters.
Sports Hernia
Well-known member
They seem to have Seattle pegged on the road, they are usually low when Seattle plays at home.
