Draft class overall speed

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,252
Reaction score
2,293
For being called a bad draft class, so far after 4 position groups running the 40. All 4 are the fastest groups ever at the combine.
 

Ruminator

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,054
Reaction score
3,492
Location
Central Florida
Right. Though it is being said 2026 will be a "weak" draft, some teams are still going to get some damn good players.
 

projectorfreak

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2022
Messages
1,230
Reaction score
920
Location
Western State
At least some fast players
Seems like a perfect Jerry Jones draft
No matter how fast you are you have to know how to play the game
 
OP
OP
C

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,252
Reaction score
2,293
At least some fast players
Seems like a perfect Jerry Jones draft
No matter how fast you are you have to know how to play the game
I don’t think it’s near as bad as people have said it is. It just doesn’t have any great QBs, so people will automatically dismiss it.

Mendoza might be great, but I’d have a hard time passing on Reese instead. Guy is going to be a monster at LB. Plus the first round is going to have 7-8 DE picked this year. There is some crazy amount of edges this year.
 

Mike MacDarnold

Active member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2025
Messages
111
Reaction score
179
We’ll see. Workout warriors are a thing (eg Mike Mamula) and it doesn’t always translate to football.
 

Pandion Haliaetus

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
4,147
Reaction score
1,266
Also there are just big time position groups that seem overall lacking in both elite prototypical blue chip prospects in general or legitimate depth: QB, WR, OT, TE, DL. Not a lot to be desired after 1-2 rounds.

But if you need RB, IOL, LBers, and DBs this is probably going to be a solid class for you and you'll still get some decent players further into the draft.

I think just a lot of people feel that the draft will fall off a cliff around the 4th- 5th round. That its more quality than quantity but the quality might be more relevant to lesser positions.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
C

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,252
Reaction score
2,293
Also there are just big time position groups that seem overall lacking in both elite prototypical blue chip prospects in general or legitimate depth: QB, WR, OT, TE, DL. Not a lot to be desired after 1-2 rounds.

But if you need RB, IOL, LBers, and DBs this is probably going to be a solid class for you and you'll still get some decent players further into the draft.

I think just a lot of people feel that the draft will fall off a cliff around the 4th- 5th round. That its more quality than quantity but the quality might be more relevant to lesser positions.
I think I’ve seen there could be 8 pass rushing DE taken in the first round. Seems like a pretty solid group as well.
 

Bobblehead

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
5,660
Reaction score
2,263
Well the ones calling it a bad draft class, are the ones that see very few top tier QB's in the top 2 rounds... so it must be a bad class... Can't be any worse than the year we took the preacher, now that was a bad bad class.
 

Latest posts

Top