Not bad, the whole panel had relevant things to say, more about Kyler and Cardinals weapons than the Seahawks, but Mina does chime in on the total LB changeover in the MacD Seattle defense and how past results with previous LBs may not be predictive of current performance with new LBs Jones and the rookie. The whole panel is *entertaining* and does a nice job of setting up how *interesting* the matchup should be. That's their job, to attract emotions and eyeballs. Well done.
What they didn't really address is the matchup between the Seahawks offense and the Cardinals' defense. Except the one guy who thought Kenneth Walker would have a good day.
I simply find I get more in-depth analysis from the football minds on this board, that by the time I listen to the "national" media, that often, these types of points have already been discussed and rehashed that it's like the media people are cherry-picking from here. For example, not one mentioned the impact of the return of Abe Lucas or the promotion of Olu Oluwatimi to the starting O-Line rotation. If, with better O-Line play, Seattle can create a bruising ground game, that will dramatically affect the way the game turns out.
I feel that often media faces can be "assigned", by producers, to rep a certain take on the teams, players and game, again, for *entertainment* purposes. Just doing their job.
Not really intending to diss the national media, or Mina (though some deserve a major diss, like clown-ass Nick Wright), just saying I don't view their content as essential analysis for betting men, compared to other sources. For drinking men, absolutely, go all in, have fun, but maybe place any bets before the drinking.
