Anthony Richardson only praised Pete after interviewing with teams

James in PA

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
4,898
Reaction score
4,683
Damn, the entire league has met with this guy. He's probably not dropping to 5, which is a shame. Would love to see him take over for Geno in a year or two. seems like he'd be a great fit in Seattle.
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,674
Reaction score
6,837
Location
SoCal Desert
Let's say that Richardson is available at #5, here's the risk and reward. Reward, a good to great QB that keeps 12s entertained for years if not decade, after 10 years we can still trade him like Wilson for multiple picks Risk, if he fails, we would have passed on Will Anderson or Carter, it sucks but when was the last time a DT or a DE totally take over a season or a game? OK, Clowney did, for one game vs SF.
 

EverydayImRusselin

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
2,015
Reaction score
661
Let's say that Richardson is available at #5, here's the risk and reward. Reward, a good to great QB that keeps 12s entertained for years if not decade, after 10 years we can still trade him like Wilson for multiple picks Risk, if he fails, we would have passed on Will Anderson or Carter, it sucks but when was the last time a DT or a DE totally take over a season or a game? OK, Clowney did, for one game vs SF.
If he's there at 5, at least 1 of Andersen and Carter are gone.

There's a clear cut top 6 in this draft IMO. 4 QBs and Andersen, Carter.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,980
Reaction score
9,882
Location
Delaware
You guys watched him throw right? Like I get he's a physical freak, but dude has the accuracy of a teenage boy on pissing.
But he's on the money deep, and he's on the money when on the run. Those are the ones that are hard to teach.

He's going to need a year or two being torn down and built up mechanically to allow him to operate within structure, but as it stands now? I mean, his heat map looks like late-career Russ.

He's got everything you can't realistically teach, and most of what he's missing is the stuff that can be taught.

It's a gamble, but he's a rare specimen. It's gotta come down to his mental makeup and how willing he is to really learn.

I will say - Greg Olson is a hire that makes sense anyway, but it makes a LOT of sense if they're giving him a ball of clay in Richardson to work with.
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,210
Reaction score
4,026
Deep balls are like 2 a game. His intermediate and short accuracy are usually high and off target. Watching a guy like Stroud absolutely nail those short passes sets the bar high. So what if he can't throw the extra few yards? I get the attraction to Richardson, we have a physical freak like him in DK and hes great. But rare physical specimens doesn't mean anything as a QB. I'd rather have a guy who absolutely dots the 90% of passes they throw.
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,674
Reaction score
6,837
Location
SoCal Desert
He singled out Pete to praise, either Pete and him really connected which is possible. Or, he realized the opportunity to sit and learn behind Geno, the hawks supporting cast of 1 sensational RB, 2 great WRs, 3 good TEs, and 4 young linemen that will only get better. In the end, it's as easy as 1234 for him to single out the Hawks as his ideal destination.

He can do worse, a lot worse, to a team without as good a group of supporting cast, yet needed him to start in day 1.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,980
Reaction score
9,882
Location
Delaware
Deep balls are like 2 a game. His intermediate and short accuracy are usually high and off target. Watching a guy like Stroud absolutely nail those short passes sets the bar high. So what if he can't throw the extra few yards? I get the attraction to Richardson, we have a physical freak like him in DK and hes great. But rare physical specimens doesn't mean anything as a QB. I'd rather have a guy who absolutely dots the 90% of passes they throw.
I like Stroud a lot as well, he throws a pretty ball that looks almost telepathically controlled once it's in the air.

With Richardson, I think his short and intermediate accuracy issues can be mitigated through technical refinement. I also think he's gonna add a hell of a lot of value on the ground, which reduces the need for as robust of a short game.
 

GemCity

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
2,665
Reaction score
3,080
Richardson or Stroud at 5 would make me moist.
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,674
Reaction score
6,837
Location
SoCal Desert
I like Stroud a lot as well, he throws a pretty ball that looks almost telepathically controlled once it's in the air.

With Richardson, I think his short and intermediate accuracy issues can be mitigated through technical refinement. I also think he's gonna add a hell of a lot of value on the ground, which reduces the need for as robust of a short game.
To counter your opinion, Richardson did played 3 years of college ball appeared in 24 games, could he be coach up on key areas still? We shall see, but I am still of the opinion to draft him :)
 

Chevy

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
806
Reaction score
716
He singled out Pete to praise, either Pete and him really connected which is possible. Or, he realized the opportunity to sit and learn behind Geno, the hawks supporting cast of 1 sensational RB, 2 great WRs, 3 good TEs, and 4 young linemen that will only get better. In the end, it's as easy as 1234 for him to single out the Hawks as his ideal destination.

He can do worse, a lot worse, to a team without as good a group of supporting cast, yet needed him to start in day 1.
He also said something to the affect that he gets along with everyone in the lockeroom. I felt like that was a comment directed to the Seahawks, him basically saying I'm not bigger than the team (like Russell Wilson was).
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,980
Reaction score
9,882
Location
Delaware
To counter your opinion, Richardson did played 3 years of college ball appeared in 24 games, could he be coach up on key areas still? We shall see, but I am still of the opinion to draft him :)
I think he could. It's all technical stuff. He'll probably never be perfect in that regard, but he'll never have to be as long as he has his level of athleticism (in the best case outcome).
 
Top