kidhawk":a28wrknc said:
DavidSeven":a28wrknc said:
You can't really compare what a QB does to what a free safety does. I admit that Earl is basically the "Russell" of the defense, but you can't compare a safety's value to that of a franchise QB. If you could, they would be paid $16-20M/yr. It'd be like saying San Francisco is built around Bowman. While I agree he's their best pure football player, that engine doesn't run without Kaepernick. How many wins do they get with that D and Colt McCoy running the ship?
This team only made "that leap" when Russell was unleashed. Our D was smothering in the first half of 2012, but we were still a .500 team when Russell had the handcuffs on. A franchise QB is EVERYTHING, and it's where you always want to start.
Our team is NOT built around our QB. We easily CAN build a team around him, but that is absolutely not how our team was built. I don't know how anyone can watch our team play ball control offense and watch our defense perform and NOT see that it was built around Earl Thomas and Pete's defensive strategies?
What do you mean by "built around"? Yes, we have a really good defense that relies on elite play from a single high safety. It also relies heavily on near perfect sideline coverage from the corners and pressure from the front-4. We also have a really good offense that's built around capitalizing on rushing (which is opened up by a mobile QB) and explosive throws. Can we win games convincingly when Earl is having an off-day? I would argue, yes, because I've seen it happen. Can we win games when Russell is off? Yes, but the games are a lot closer.
If our team is built around ball control, wouldn't it be more accurate to say it's built around Marshawn Lynch? There are several pieces involved in making our defense work. In terms of ball control, it's predominantly about Marshawn Lynch. Of course, I don't accept that argument. If your QB is a franchise player, then he is the most important player on your team. See: gaves vs. Chicago, Atlanta, Tampa Bay, etc.