NaVorro Bowman lectures Kaep about the 'fins hat

Discuss any and all NFL-related topics and matters of interest here. RATING: PG-13
  • Maybe he should lecture Ahmad Brooks about drinking, fighting and guns. :stirthepot:
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 8896
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


  • HansGruber wrote:
    SF49r wrote:Well he actually did sack Russel Wilson when they played in SF. When they played in Seattle I don't recall him playing that game because of an injury


    Well, it's not surprising that you don't remember him playing, since he had 0 sacks and 1 tackle and totally disappeared in that game. Interesting you'd bring up the injury, since it was actually Justin Smith who was injured and most of the NFL knows that without Justin Smith holding for Aldon Smith, he ain't all that great.


    Actually it was revealed later that Aldon suffered an injury at the NE game as well.
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • RichNhansom wrote:That was my thinking also. 13 wins to 11 to 9 and probably 7 after loosing their entire secondary, Gore and Willis. Crabs will probably be gone too.

    Only a Niner fan could ignore win total whole making that factual argument of improvement. Comical as always.


    So your saying that a team that hypothetically makes it to the SB with a 9-7 record would have achieved less than a team that lost in the wild card round but had 12 wins during the season?
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • RichNhansom wrote:That was my thinking also. 13 wins to 11 to 9 and probably 7 after loosing their entire secondary, Gore and Willis. Crabs will probably be gone too.

    Only a Niner fan could ignore win total whole making that factual argument of improvement. Comical as always.


    Or to put it into perspective, do you think that the Seahawks achieved more than the Saints in the 2010/2011 postseason?

    Let me put it this way for you...we have made it deeper and achieved more in the postseason each year consecutively since Harbaugh took the team over. So I have no doubt that he will have us primed and ready to do the same this coming postseason, because that's what great coaches do for their team.
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • NinerLifer wrote:
    RichNhansom wrote:That was my thinking also. 13 wins to 11 to 9 and probably 7 after loosing their entire secondary, Gore and Willis. Crabs will probably be gone too.

    Only a Niner fan could ignore win total whole making that factual argument of improvement. Comical as always.


    Or to put it into perspective, do you think that the Seahawks achieved more than the Saints in the 2010/2011 postseason?

    Let me put it this way for you...we have made it deeper and achieved more in the postseason each year consecutively since Harbaugh took the team over. So I have no doubt that he will have us primed and ready to do the same this coming postseason, because that's what great coaches do for their team.


    You come off as if you expect to do more each season simply because you advanced one more game than the year before but you are ignoring the first year you had home field throughout and the next only one week then on the road. Your also ignoring that you won two less games. Why isn't that trend as applicable as advancing one more game in the playoffs? Trends don't only work in one direction so by your math you will win 9 games, likely making you a wildcard team and then you would have to win three on the road and very likely one of those in Seattle. Or are you saying that that trend isn't just as likely? I honestly think it is much more likely that you end up with 9 wins but not a shot in the playoffs.

    Oh and I would be more than willing to honor any bet you would like to suggest that my prediction is more accurate than yours.
    The Lion has no interest in the opinion of the sheep.
    RichNhansom
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3027
    Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am


  • RichNhansom wrote:
    NinerLifer wrote:
    RichNhansom wrote:That was my thinking also. 13 wins to 11 to 9 and probably 7 after loosing their entire secondary, Gore and Willis. Crabs will probably be gone too.

    Only a Niner fan could ignore win total whole making that factual argument of improvement. Comical as always.


    Or to put it into perspective, do you think that the Seahawks achieved more than the Saints in the 2010/2011 postseason?

    Let me put it this way for you...we have made it deeper and achieved more in the postseason each year consecutively since Harbaugh took the team over. So I have no doubt that he will have us primed and ready to do the same this coming postseason, because that's what great coaches do for their team.


    You come off as if you expect to do more each season simply because you advanced one more game than the year before but you are ignoring the first year you had home field throughout and the next only one week then on the road. Your also ignoring that you won two less games. Why isn't that trend as applicable as advancing one more game in the playoffs? Trends don't only work in one direction so by your math you will win 9 games, likely making you a wildcard team and then you would have to win three on the road and very likely one of those in Seattle. Or are you saying that that trend isn't just as likely? I honestly think it is much more likely that you end up with 9 wins but not a shot in the playoffs.

    Oh and I would be more than willing to honor any bet you would like to suggest that my prediction is more accurate than yours.


    9 wins from either of our teams will result in missing the playoffs this season I believe. It isn't realistic to expect the rest of the NFC to at the best only produce 1 team from each division to have a winning record. For this reason I will be highly surprised if you guys make the playoffs because the Niners will win the division. :th2thumbs:

    Enough with the fortune telling though. The reason that I am not concentrating on the regular season record is because once you are in the playoffs the regular season record doesn't matter anymore, as was witnessed last season when we won the NFC Championship despite having 1.5 less wins than the season before. Am I guaranteeing that we will win the SB this year, of course not. Am I saying that Harbaugh will have us ready and prepared to win the SB this year...ABSOLUTELY! And that is the only thing I am guaranteeing based on the fact that we have made deep postseason runs every year since he has taken over.

    We only play each other twice in the reg season, which is why unless this year you guys finally find a way to win more games on the road I don't think you will make the post season at all. That is a trend that you guys will need to break if you want to have a successful season, especially with all your 10am starts.

    Again this is just my opinion, which I know means little on here. However nobody's opinion matters at all when it comes to the outcome to the season because there are a ton of unforeseen variables that effect the outcome of each game that we can't control. I am sure the Eagles MB was posting similar stuff when they had "The Dream Team" and all the so called experts crowned them offseason champs as well...Just sayin'.
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • NinerLifer wrote:Blah, blah, blah, blah.......
    Again this is just my opinion, which I know means little on here.


    You should have started and stopped with this statement. I think you are going to be surprised and devastated by the ninnies performance this season and shocked at the domination by Seattle over the next few years. Nothing personal but my prediction is you will be posting A LOT less once SF slips back to mediocrity which starts this season!
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!

    May the spirit of our friend The Radish live on forever!
    User avatar
    Sports Hernia
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 12140
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: Lombardi Land


  • Niner the key differences is you have key weakness's like your receiving core and huge question marks at multiple other positions. I'm not making my prediction solely based on hope like you.

    The road schedule looks daunting no doubt but we also have a more mature team that didn't get weaker in the offseason and likely got much better and I am not hoping based on washed up CB's or that a #2 WR can suddenly become a #1 or even that rookies will replace all pro plaers or Wilson's #1 AND #2 targets. I am basing that off proven track records at success and documented as elite.

    Just as difficult as or road schedule is the opposite in our home schedule and we went unbeaten at home last year so why would an easier schedule with a better team be expected to have worse results?

    Please feel free to explain to me how you think your team is improved because you were worse last year than the year before no matter what the record or results were and that is a trend that is common with honeymoon coaches.

    The Seahawks have shown significant improvement each year with the record reflecting a serious downgrade at the QB position and still matching the previous years win record while the team improved it's running game from both in the bottom of the league the previous year to both top ten in 2011. The QB problem though is now obviously solved so there is no clear cut reason to think we will slide backwards.

    Your team on the other hand has significant reasons to see a slide backwards.
    The Lion has no interest in the opinion of the sheep.
    RichNhansom
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3027
    Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am


  • RichNhansom wrote:Niner the key differences is you have key weakness's like your receiving core and huge question marks at multiple other positions. I'm not making my prediction solely based on hope like you.

    The road schedule looks daunting no doubt but we also have a more mature team that didn't get weaker in the offseason and likely got much better and I am not hoping based on washed up CB's or that a #2 WR can suddenly become a #1 or even that rookies will replace all pro plaers or Wilson's #1 AND #2 targets. I am basing that off proven track records at success and documented as elite.

    Just as difficult as or road schedule is the opposite in our home schedule and we went unbeaten at home last year so why would an easier schedule with a better team be expected to have worse results?

    Please feel free to explain to me how you think your team is improved because you were worse last year than the year before no matter what the record or results were and that is a trend that is common with honeymoon coaches.

    The Seahawks have shown significant improvement each year with the record reflecting a serious downgrade at the QB position and still matching the previous years win record while the team improved it's running game from both in the bottom of the league the previous year to both top ten in 2011. The QB problem though is now obviously solved so there is no clear cut reason to think we will slide backwards.

    Your team on the other hand has significant reasons to see a slide backwards.



    So by your logic then, if you win the division, and we get in on a wild card slot, if we end up winning the SB...you would have still had the better season because you ended the regular season with a better record? :snack:
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • NinerLifer wrote:
    RichNhansom wrote:Niner the key differences is you have key weakness's like your receiving core and huge question marks at multiple other positions. I'm not making my prediction solely based on hope like you.

    The road schedule looks daunting no doubt but we also have a more mature team that didn't get weaker in the offseason and likely got much better and I am not hoping based on washed up CB's or that a #2 WR can suddenly become a #1 or even that rookies will replace all pro plaers or Wilson's #1 AND #2 targets. I am basing that off proven track records at success and documented as elite.

    Just as difficult as or road schedule is the opposite in our home schedule and we went unbeaten at home last year so why would an easier schedule with a better team be expected to have worse results?

    Please feel free to explain to me how you think your team is improved because you were worse last year than the year before no matter what the record or results were and that is a trend that is common with honeymoon coaches.

    The Seahawks have shown significant improvement each year with the record reflecting a serious downgrade at the QB position and still matching the previous years win record while the team improved it's running game from both in the bottom of the league the previous year to both top ten in 2011. The QB problem though is now obviously solved so there is no clear cut reason to think we will slide backwards.

    Your team on the other hand has significant reasons to see a slide backwards.



    So by your logic then, if you win the division, and we get in on a wild card slot, if we end up winning the SB...you would have still had the better season because you ended the regular season with a better record? :snack:

    You really can't be that daft? Really?

    PS. The ninnies ain't winning a Lombardi anytime soon, the current team had their chance last year and blew it! Now the wheels start to fall off the douchebaugh-mobile!
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!

    May the spirit of our friend The Radish live on forever!
    User avatar
    Sports Hernia
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 12140
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: Lombardi Land


  • Sports Hernia wrote:
    NinerLifer wrote:
    RichNhansom wrote:Niner the key differences is you have key weakness's like your receiving core and huge question marks at multiple other positions. I'm not making my prediction solely based on hope like you.

    The road schedule looks daunting no doubt but we also have a more mature team that didn't get weaker in the offseason and likely got much better and I am not hoping based on washed up CB's or that a #2 WR can suddenly become a #1 or even that rookies will replace all pro plaers or Wilson's #1 AND #2 targets. I am basing that off proven track records at success and documented as elite.

    Just as difficult as or road schedule is the opposite in our home schedule and we went unbeaten at home last year so why would an easier schedule with a better team be expected to have worse results?

    Please feel free to explain to me how you think your team is improved because you were worse last year than the year before no matter what the record or results were and that is a trend that is common with honeymoon coaches.

    The Seahawks have shown significant improvement each year with the record reflecting a serious downgrade at the QB position and still matching the previous years win record while the team improved it's running game from both in the bottom of the league the previous year to both top ten in 2011. The QB problem though is now obviously solved so there is no clear cut reason to think we will slide backwards.

    Your team on the other hand has significant reasons to see a slide backwards.



    So by your logic then, if you win the division, and we get in on a wild card slot, if we end up winning the SB...you would have still had the better season because you ended the regular season with a better record? :snack:

    You really can't be that daft? Really?

    PS. The ninnies ain't winning a Lombardi anytime soon, the current team had their chance last year and blew it! Now the wheels start to fall off the douchebaugh-mobile!


    Because you said so? I recall the same type of comments being made after we lost in the NFCCG against the Giants the season prior. But there we were the very next season in the NFCCG again and won.

    But if you so so sport! :th2thumbs:
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • NinerLifer wrote:
    Sports Hernia wrote:
    RichNhansom wrote:Niner the key differences is you have key weakness's like your receiving core and huge question marks at multiple other positions. I'm not making my prediction solely based on hope like you.

    The road schedule looks daunting no doubt but we also have a more mature team that didn't get weaker in the offseason and likely got much better and I am not hoping based on washed up CB's or that a #2 WR can suddenly become a #1 or even that rookies will replace all pro plaers or Wilson's #1 AND #2 targets. I am basing that off proven track records at success and documented as elite.

    Just as difficult as or road schedule is the opposite in our home schedule and we went unbeaten at home last year so why would an easier schedule with a better team be expected to have worse results?

    Please feel free to explain to me how you think your team is improved because you were worse last year than the year before no matter what the record or results were and that is a trend that is common with honeymoon coaches.

    The Seahawks have shown significant improvement each year with the record reflecting a serious downgrade at the QB position and still matching the previous years win record while the team improved it's running game from both in the bottom of the league the previous year to both top ten in 2011. The QB problem though is now obviously solved so there is no clear cut reason to think we will slide backwards.

    Your team on the other hand has significant reasons to see a slide backwards.


    So by your logic then, if you win the division, and we get in on a wild card slot, if we end up winning the SB...you would have still had the better season because you ended the regular season with a better record? :snack:

    You really can't be that daft? Really?

    PS. The ninnies ain't winning a Lombardi anytime soon, the current team had their chance last year and blew it! Now the wheels start to fall off the douchebaugh-mobile!


    Because you said so? I recall the same type of comments being made after we lost in the NFCCG against the Giants the season prior. But there we were the very next season in the NFCCG again and won.

    But if you so so sport! :th2thumbs:

    Yes, because I "said so" Skippy! SuperBowl losers don't make it back the next year, and check history on that!
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!

    May the spirit of our friend The Radish live on forever!
    User avatar
    Sports Hernia
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 12140
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: Lombardi Land


  • I don't care about history, if you lose multiple key starters and need to rely on rookies and scrub FA's to replace them when your most important players are looking at retirement, your odds go way down.

    I understand why Ninrr fans care about history though, they have to go to the history channel to remember the glory days.
    The Lion has no interest in the opinion of the sheep.
    RichNhansom
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3027
    Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am


  • RichNhansom wrote:I don't care about history, if you lose multiple key starters and need to rely on rookies and scrub FA's to replace them when your most important players are looking at retirement, your odds go way down.

    I understand why Ninrr fans care about history though, they have to go to the history channel to remember the glory days.


    Except it is one of your own that is using "History" as an argument.

    A ton of hypocrisy going on in this MB.
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • Yeah but he's not wrong I just don't care about it. Nice try though. Maybe you should go look up the definition of hypocrisy or you could just go to the web zone for examples.
    The Lion has no interest in the opinion of the sheep.
    RichNhansom
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3027
    Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am


  • RichNhansom wrote:Yeah but he's not wrong I just don't care about it. Nice try though. Maybe you should go look up the definition of hypocrisy or you could just go to the web zone for examples.


    That's why I am not a member of the Webzone.
    DISCLAIMER:

    The trash talking that I do occasionally this week is strictly for gamesmanship between opposing fanbases as a result of our upcoming matchup this week on SNF. It by no means should be taken personally.
    User avatar
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • nevermind
    "We're the 49ers, we can do whatever we want" - The Great Jim Harbaugh -
    User avatar
    Comeinpeace
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 128
    Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:11 pm
    Location: Seattle


  • NinerLifer wrote:
    RichNhansom wrote:Yeah but he's not wrong I just don't care about it. Nice try though. Maybe you should go look up the definition of hypocrisy or you could just go to the web zone for examples.


    That's why I am not a member of the Webzone.

    Which is surprising because you'd fit right in at that circus.
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!

    May the spirit of our friend The Radish live on forever!
    User avatar
    Sports Hernia
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 12140
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: Lombardi Land


Previous


It is currently Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:43 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NFL NATION ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: Onyx and 15 guests