m0ng0
Well-known member
Sadly we would have run Josh Allen out of town on a rail by game 6 of his rookie year.
I vaguely remember hearing or reading something to the affect that some of the power between Pete and John had shifted. When they were hired it was of an equal footing kind of thing. I am almost positive that it was a shifting of authority into John’s power. This past draft enforced it for me.Yes, I absolutely believe the power structure has changed when it comes to personnel decisions/acquisitions. After the season ended last year and Jody met with both Pete and JS, I thought there were some reports or at least rumors that Jody had ripped some of the power from PC, and JS was given more power over personnel decisions including the draft, which frankly is the way it should have been from the start.
And based on the most recent draft, I think a solid argument could be made that this draft was primarily John's. We didn't reach on any of our picks as we've typically done in the past, and ended up having I believe one of our best drafts since JS and PC took over. I personally believe the poor drafts of the past 7 or 8 years were primarily on Pete who's always had veto power over any personnel decisions.
I don't have anything concrete to support my opinion/theory other than a stark and obvious difference in draft strategy.
Agree with the premise, but the way you have worded this is basically swapping Wilson and Allen straight up. We would have easily had five top two round picks out of trading Wilson at that time plus at least a few veterans. Does not mean that the fans would be any more savvy, but the haul would have made it a lot more palatable.People are not being realistic on the Allen thing.
Nobody remembers Matt vs Dilfer? 1/2 the fan base was screaming for one, then another for the other.
You honestly believe that in that 1st year or 2 when Allen was struggling with accuracy issues - the fanbase would not be freaking out that we traded a HOF QB for a rookie that was struggling when most of our roster was fairly strong?
People would have lost their minds.
Allen was great last night. He flashed greatness even a few years ago. But 3-4 years ago, people would be very upset...because we would look like a solid roster with a struggling QB that could have been competing for the playoffs if only we had kept Wilson.
Our fan base is not that patient. Watch what happens to it if Pete starts losing. If Pete/JS had traded away our star QB and suddenly we started to struggle, even miss the playoffs?
People would abandon this team in droves.
Maybe the 2022 winner of the Smith/Lock duel signs a FA contract to return to Seattle to battle the incoming rookie. I can't see an obvious reason why the loser would come back, (maybe if the winner had already signed elsewhere). No reason for both of them to return if the Seahawks are looking at high 1st round pick QBs. I think it's more likely the Seahawks move on from both 2022 QBs to give the 2023 rookie a clear path....I'm curious if '23 competition is Lock, Geno and rookie or some other combination.
Yes, 3 OCs in his last 4 seasons, and almost no difference in the results.He doesn't or can't use those same tools to his advantage because we are a run-first time who had a QB who is accurate and good enough to throw it more than we want to. You've basically given a race car driver a station wagon and asked him to be a safe driver in hopes everyone else crashes and burns around you when he actually has the tools to drive an actual race car. Lets not forget he also had 3 offensive coordinators his last 4 seasons. Something was not working and it will likely continue to not work this season.
"improvement" isn't being a good soldier and handing the ball off when your running game isn't working, either.
Was told by a source that the Romulans and Vulcans and Ferengi were vying for him....Denver got him first.I don’t know if you e heard but RW is one of the best QB’s in the WORLD.
Apparently they have QB’s in China, Africa, Russia, Europe, South America and beyond.
I don’t know why he stopped at the WORLD. Why not go for the UNIVERSE?
Yes, I absolutely believe the power structure has changed when it comes to personnel decisions/acquisitions. After the season ended last year and Jody met with both Pete and JS, I thought there were some reports or at least rumors that Jody had ripped some of the power from PC, and JS was given more power over personnel decisions including the draft, which frankly is the way it should have been from the start.
And based on the most recent draft, I think a solid argument could be made that this draft was primarily John's. We didn't reach on any of our picks as we've typically done in the past, and ended up having I believe one of our best drafts since JS and PC took over. I personally believe the poor drafts of the past 7 or 8 years were primarily on Pete who's always had veto power over any personnel decisions.
I don't have anything concrete to support my opinion/theory other than a stark and obvious difference in
What really pisses me off is tDenver media making it out to be that the Seahawks are smearing Wilson! They are making wilson a victim in all this and quite frankly that makes me sick and makes me dis like Wilson even more! Just sayin man... i mean if Seattle had a reason why they wanted to trade him , it s a frigging business thats the nfl... sorry your feelings got hurt Russ time to man up!Poor little Russ, big bad Carroll. Team Russ is working overtime painting victimhood for the Monday matchup where the long suffering Russ will finally play as he is capable of without being handcuffed by evil Pete.
Under Pete?The Russ camp's leaking of Hawks tried to trade Russ multiple times may buy sympathy from Bronco fans and average ESPN readers, but it's backfiring among 12s. Most 12s are asking ourselves, won't we be better off with Allen or Mahomes?
Are all these potential moves verified as true?If the Seahawks tried to trade Wilson for Allen then presumably this is what's being intimated?:
The Seahawks wanted Allen. They offered Wilson to the Browns for the #1 pick with which the Seahawks would pick Allen. The Browns declined and picked Mayfield.
The Seahawks offered Wilson to the Giants for the #2 pick. The Giants declined and picked Barkley.
The Seahawks offered Wilson to the Jets for the #3 pick. The Jets declined and picked Darnold.
The Seahawks tried to trade with the Browns for the #4 pick with a pick/player package excluding Wilson with a view to trading Wilson somewhere else later on. The Browns declined and picked Ward.
The Seahawks offered Wilson to the Broncos for the #5 pick. The Broncos declined and picked Chubb.
The Seahawks tried to trade with the Colts for the #6 pick with a pick/player package excluding Wilson with a view to trading Wilson somewhere else later on. The Colts declined and picked Nelson.
The Seahawks offered Wilson to the Bills for the #7 pick. The Bills declined and picked Allen.
If not the case then why not? If they did wouldn't everyone have heard about this before now?
The Bills faithful and the Hawks FOI recall watching the halftime show a few years ago between Bills/Chiefs.
Terry Bradshaw says "you can’t teach accuracy" and basically said Josh Allen will never be an accurate QB.
That was the popular narrative at the time on Josh Allen. So all of this "I wish we picked up Josh Allen" talk is all now rosy, ignore the past, made up narrative.
Because back then, everyone but the Bills faithful thought he sucked.
What really pisses me off is tDenver media making it out to be that the Seahawks are smearing Wilson! They are making wilson a victim in all this and quite frankly that makes me sick and makes me dis like Wilson even more! Just sayin man... i mean if Seattle had a reason why they wanted to trade him , it s a frigging business thats the nfl... sorry your feelings got hurt Russ time to man up!
No. It questions the veracity of the Seahawks trading for the #1 pick. The Seahawks supposedly tried to trade Wilson to the Browns for the #1 pick because they wanted Allen. If true then why wouldn't they trade Wilson for a lower pick if they'd still get Allen with that lower pick? The pick # wasn't important, the player was. Trying to get Allen at #1 but not trying to get him at #2-7 wouldn't make sense.Are all these potential moves verified as true?
Forgive my ignorance.
No. It questions the veracity of the Seahawks trading for the #1 pick. The Seahawks supposedly tried to trade Wilson to the Browns for the #1 pick because they wanted Allen. If true then why wouldn't they trade Wilson for a lower pick if they'd still get Allen with that lower pick? The pick # wasn't important, the player was. Trying to get Allen at #1 but not trying to get him at #2-7 wouldn't make sense.
No. It questions the veracity of the Seahawks trading for the #1 pick. The Seahawks supposedly tried to trade Wilson to the Browns for the #1 pick because they wanted Allen. If true then why wouldn't they trade Wilson for a lower pick if they'd still get Allen with that lower pick? The pick # wasn't important, the player was. Trying to get Allen at #1 but not trying to get him at #2-7 wouldn't make sense.
They did, but since they selected Mayfield at #1 they wouldn't have accepted Wilson for the #4 pick. The Seahawks would have had to put togther a trade package that didn't include Wilson. That would have been tricky to say the least. It would have been easier for the Seahawks to trade for the #2, #3, #5, or #7 picks.Browns also had the 4th pick
Trading Wilson on draft day I would imagine is very unlikely - the call would have gone out well before then