CodeWarrior
New member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,769
- Reaction score
- 0
He seems to work better with Tukuafu than Coleman.
Laloosh":1jbvq02h said:Was nice to see. I had doubts and he wasn't doing much behind that line compared to Rawls.
Will be interesting to see how he looks when we face another good run stuffing defense again. I don't think he gets to the edge against STL or AZ. He had a lot of yards before contact against SF so I credit the OL with a lot of his success.
Tical21":16i8u5q9 said:I'm as big of a Lynch supporter as there is, but SF was awful in their run fits, particularly setting the edge. That was about as easy of a 125 as you're going to find.
I wasn't overly impressed by Rawls in this game. The one good run he had, he had a HUGE hole. The majority of times where he didn't have a great hole, he couldn't find anything, break any tackles, or fall forward. He looks above average to me. Did anybody see who led Cleveland in rushing yards this weekend? I'm not being overly serious, I think Turbin and Rawls are probably quite equal.
Ah, yes, thank you for pointing that out! Certainly should have given the line some kudos in my statement.Largent80":32py056m said:I don't know about run fits, sounds like a p.t.s.d. problem, but I saw some damn good blocking in the run game.
Tical21":2wmyex12 said:I'm as big of a Lynch supporter as there is, but SF was awful in their run fits, particularly setting the edge. That was about as easy of a 125 as you're going to find.
I wasn't overly impressed by Rawls in this game. The one good run he had, he had a HUGE hole. The majority of times where he didn't have a great hole, he couldn't find anything, break any tackles, or fall forward. He looks above average to me. Did anybody see who led Cleveland in rushing yards this weekend? I'm not being overly serious, I think Turbin and Rawls are probably quite equal.