Seahawks worst red zone team (UPDATED-still worst in NFL)

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,686
Reaction score
1,703
Location
Roy Wa.
Largent80":1xn5wrqy said:
So?...It gives us a goal to get better and goals are good.

Nah, TD's are better we have enough Field "GOALS" already :)
 

Lords of Scythia

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
2,623
Reaction score
196
Russell Wilson is still getting his passing dialed in with two new receivers -- that brother's got a lot of room for improvement. So does the offensive line, which is getting notably better every game. The field is shortened in the red zone, so the pass rush is more intense. Don't despair about this stat -- stuff will change.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
5,510
Reaction score
3,187
Location
Kennewick, WA
Shane Falco":11e3bedy said:
The sad thing is that Red Zone TD% based on the last couple of seasons is exactly why they gave up so much to get Graham, to get better at it than we were. And now not only are we not as good as we were in the red zone, we have fallen off a cliff. The excitement of getting Graham in the off-season and imagining how formidable our offense was going to be in the red zone this season has made this a million times more disappointing.

It's still early and you have to take into account that there's going to be a learning curve, especially with a tight end that's as unique as Graham is and a quarterback that has as unique of a skill set that Russell has.

But that excuse is getting pretty thin. Based on what we've given up, ie a Pro Bowl center and a #1 draft choice, coupled with the fact that we didn't do hardly anything to address the void that was created, makes me feel as if this trade is on it's way to being as bad as the Harvin trade was.
 
Top