watertaco":9idw8qx1 said:FlyingGreg":9idw8qx1 said:Graham is such a finesse guy. We showed the blue print on him...get in his face and get physical and he folds his little Boy Scout tent and goes home.
You have literally no idea what you're talking about, do you?
Earl Thomas literally kangaroo-kicked Kimmy to make him drop a sure first down. I guess little Earl isn't good enough to play the game fairly. Maybe the Saints should have kicked Percy too. Also, we laid the wood on you guys too. As noticed when Bush leveled Tate and Harvin.
CANHawk":9idw8qx1 said:Sounds like "I'm Jimmy" doesn't really understand the rules...
Do you have any understanding of the game of football? You're not allowed to hold a receiver past five yards. Yet Wagner and Wright held onto him like scared little girls the entire game. Why the refs did not call this, I don't know. But the Saints aren't the only people who complain about your blatant holding. What's even more ironic is when Sherman held onto Lance Moore one play, Lance pushes off to get the prick off of him, and the 13th man calls him for PI. How do you explain that?
Thanks, you proved our point you DON'T know the rules of the game of football.
You can smack, grab, push, hand battle and various other attributes to playing defensive back so long as you dont take the receiver off his route, or impede the catch without making a play for the ball at the same time.
Seriously, if you can't use facts; Then present them in some way to make your argument valid, you probably shouldn't be mocking the "literacy" rate of Washington, since you; clearly can't read the NFL rule book that is publicly posted.
You'll also have to show me those "Kam headbutts" Lemme guess, now how we hit is illegal too huh?
All in all probably the least classy Saints fan I've encounter.. Not exactly sure how you feel that hit on Graham was a "kick". But keep grasping at straws... You guys laid the wood on us? Is that why you still lost. YOu do have your own message board right?