Recon_Hawk
Well-known member
Are there certain scenario that would change you opinions on the Seahawks draft plans based on an off-season move by the front office?
Some examples:
- James Carpenter re-signs for cheap: 5 returning starters. Is a high pick still a possibility?
- Julius Thomas is signed: Lets go get a wideout and really step up the offense OR
we just got a weapon for Wilson, we can grab WR value later in the draft.
- Lynch Retires: Can we get by with Turbin and Cmike without a high pick or is RB a huge need?
- Lynch agrees to a contract extension: does that drop the RBs off your board or at least much lower?
There's probably dozens more moves that would be interesting to consider. Some small moves won't change your views much but maybe just enough to shift your attention to another draft prospect or position group.
Also, is there a specific player that jumps up your top wanted list because one of these moves filled a need?
Some examples:
- James Carpenter re-signs for cheap: 5 returning starters. Is a high pick still a possibility?
- Julius Thomas is signed: Lets go get a wideout and really step up the offense OR
we just got a weapon for Wilson, we can grab WR value later in the draft.
- Lynch Retires: Can we get by with Turbin and Cmike without a high pick or is RB a huge need?
- Lynch agrees to a contract extension: does that drop the RBs off your board or at least much lower?
There's probably dozens more moves that would be interesting to consider. Some small moves won't change your views much but maybe just enough to shift your attention to another draft prospect or position group.
Also, is there a specific player that jumps up your top wanted list because one of these moves filled a need?