BamKam":1v5zzs40 said:Come on guys if any other defense did that to us this board would be outraged.
Sgt. Largent":37j82vvp said:CEHawk":37j82vvp said:RiverDog":37j82vvp said:It was a stupid penalty and Sherman deserves a stiff fine. Hopefully he won't get suspended for it, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. The play was over, not even anywhere near Sherman and the receiver was just standing there, not involved in the play. But I'm not going to call him a cheap shot artist.
Not even a subjective call. The Seahawks corners have been coached to make these hits, and coached well. It was a completely legal hit and takes that receiver out of the play as a blocker. I believe Pete Carroll talked about this when Browner made a similar hit on Greg Jennings with no flag. Totally legal hit that SHOULD be made.
There's a difference between being physical all the way through the whistle and blowing someone up, Sherman did the latter. It's deemed excessive, thus the penalty.
Uncle Si":27xb2rga said:HawKnPeppa":27xb2rga said:RiverDog":27xb2rga said:It was a stupid penalty and Sherman deserves a stiff fine. Hopefully he won't get suspended for it, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. The play was over, not even anywhere near Sherman and the receiver was just standing there, not involved in the play. But I'm not going to call him a cheap shot artist.
This post brings 'clueless' to a new level.
easy... the whole play was subjective. some are going to see it one way, others another. Sherman was trying to take advantage of a rule (or lack of) that allows defensive players to hit offensive players when the QB is on the run.
There's no argument that he took a run at a guy not paying attention. I dont see it a big deal. but i can see how others do.
You've just given a rationalization that could be put into a dictionary to show one being subjective. Rules is rules. I can see mojo's point about why the call was made. But, in that the officials are still being subjective with objective rules - molding and bending the set rules to possibly even help a team that is being out coached and out played. If the NFL doesn't like it, they need to change the rules and not penalize the Seahawks for it. If you don't like Sherman's play, then you have a problem with the team philosophy and thus... you are not really a fan of how the Seahawks coach their players to play the collision sport of football.Sgt. Largent":1qudiwyt said:CEHawk":1qudiwyt said:RiverDog":1qudiwyt said:It was a stupid penalty and Sherman deserves a stiff fine. Hopefully he won't get suspended for it, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. The play was over, not even anywhere near Sherman and the receiver was just standing there, not involved in the play. But I'm not going to call him a cheap shot artist.
Not even a subjective call. The Seahawks corners have been coached to make these hits, and coached well. It was a completely legal hit and takes that receiver out of the play as a blocker. I believe Pete Carroll talked about this when Browner made a similar hit on Greg Jennings with no flag. Totally legal hit that SHOULD be made.
There's a difference between being physical all the way through the whistle and blowing someone up, Sherman did the latter. It's deemed excessive, thus the penalty.
Nudge? Really? That sort of play stops players short of fulfilling their dreams to make an NFL roster. That's not how players are coached... and for good reason. It's entirely possible that if Sherman didn't see the play was over, that removing a player from the play like that could have served to prevent a teammate from getting hit in the same fashion.RiverDog":ydhvau7k said:RichNhansom":ydhvau7k said:RiverDog":ydhvau7k said:It was a stupid penalty and Sherman deserves a stiff fine. Hopefully he won't get suspended for it, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. The play was over, not even anywhere near Sherman and the receiver was just standing there, not involved in the play. But I'm not going to call him a cheap shot artist.
The play was over? Even though when Sherman hit the receiver while the ball was currently in the air? Have to disagree with you completely.
Did he have to take the shot? Nope but it doesn't change the rule that once the ball is in the air anyone not being targeted for the catch is now a blocker. If your going to change that then you need to change the rules saying receivers cannot become blockers down field.
Will they fine him? I don't know but that is only because the NFL is trying to turn the game into tickle football. Not because the hit was even remotely questionable.
I can understand if Sherman couldn't see if the play was over or not, but he could see that the receiver had clearly given up on the play and it was obvious he wasn't going to be involved. All he had to do was nudge him out of bounds if he wasn't sure the pass was going to be close. No way did he have to unload on him like that.
Mark my words, he'll get a fine for it.
KK84":uchhfxmh said:Sherman just got a little too excited from injecting too many marijuanas and smoking adderall.
mikeak":16b8tffx said:I don't have the game on tape - could anyone review this?
I was fine with the hit because as I saw it Brees was scrambling (so left the pocket) but had not thrown the pass. Sherman hit the receiver to make sure he was taken out of the play.
So I specificially thought the receiver was still involved in the game and that was the purpose for it.
If the pass had been thrown then I think it was unnecessary.
I do 100% agree with the comments though that the refs were going to flag him for something and when they realized Brees was not in the pocket (which Sherman pointed out to them) they just came with the 15 yarder that they can call for somebody breathing to heavily on the field........
I would not be outraged. You don't have to speak for me, thank you. This is the same sort of thing that I see occasionally during youth football on the weekends. Someone sees a vicious hit and they immediately cry foul. If one of our players legally got blown up, I may not like it... but, if it's legal, it's legal.TJH":36jmzc7a said:BamKam":36jmzc7a said:Come on guys if any other defense did that to us this board would be outraged.
Absolutely. Nobody here would every admit that though.
TeamoftheCentury":34t5sz27 said:Nudge? Really? That sort of play stops players short of fulfilling their dreams to make an NFL roster. That's not how players are coached... and for good reason. It's entirely possible that if Sherman didn't see the play was over, that removing a player from the play like that could have served to prevent a teammate from getting hit in the same fashion.RiverDog":34t5sz27 said:RichNhansom":34t5sz27 said:RiverDog":34t5sz27 said:It was a stupid penalty and Sherman deserves a stiff fine. Hopefully he won't get suspended for it, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. The play was over, not even anywhere near Sherman and the receiver was just standing there, not involved in the play. But I'm not going to call him a cheap shot artist.
The play was over? Even though when Sherman hit the receiver while the ball was currently in the air? Have to disagree with you completely.
Did he have to take the shot? Nope but it doesn't change the rule that once the ball is in the air anyone not being targeted for the catch is now a blocker. If your going to change that then you need to change the rules saying receivers cannot become blockers down field.
Will they fine him? I don't know but that is only because the NFL is trying to turn the game into tickle football. Not because the hit was even remotely questionable.
I can understand if Sherman couldn't see if the play was over or not, but he could see that the receiver had clearly given up on the play and it was obvious he wasn't going to be involved. All he had to do was nudge him out of bounds if he wasn't sure the pass was going to be close. No way did he have to unload on him like that.
Mark my words, he'll get a fine for it.
Sherman is a professional football player. Arguably the best at his position. If Troy Palomalu made a hit like that, the announcers and everyone else would be applauding him for his physical play and intimidation. I'll grant that seeing it was shocking. Getting hit will look like that at times. Players like Clay Matthews (et all) receive high praise for blowing players up. If it's legal, it's legal. My opinion is that is where the officials should not step over their bounds. Leave it to the players to work out on the field. Sherman didn't try to destroy his knees or otherwise take away his livelihood. To me, that's the line between cheap and legally blowing up another player.
Brees is first rate. Unless I'm missing something, he was doing his job and merely pleased to get the call. He would take any advantageous call he could get at that point.ManBunts":tjf7my37 said:Speaking of cheap shots, I can't find a replay, but has anyone seen any talk of Brees' whiny little acting job when his helmet got flicked? I used to think he was a classy player, but after the Brooks hit where he "expected the flag" and then this bit of shenanigans, seems like he's put himself on a pedestal. It was a pleasure to see him get knocked off last night