Do we have the pieces to run Mike McD's Defense?

Appyhawk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 27, 2019
Messages
3,683
Reaction score
1,412
Location
Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montan
We are so cap strapped there isn't a heck of a lot we can do all of a sudden. But I think we could do a little bit, and with some contract maneuvering we could do enough to make a positive difference.
Macdonald could convince Queen to take a bit of a cut on his salary dream and that would be a great assist at LB. Also Clowney will be a FA that won't be too expensive and had a very productive year this year because our new HC knew just how to use him. I've always liked Clowney, just thought he wasn't being used right. Letting Taylor go would help a little bit to pay for the exchange. Ravens have a DL brute that would help us a lot but will be very expensive so I don't see that one happening.
Hiring the right OC will also make a difference, especially if we can help that line in the draft. IOW we can begin improving right away without having to go through desperate losing years.
I am confident Macdonald already has a lot of ideas for how to make this team a winner or he wouldn't even have considered taking the job.
 

WmHBonney

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
2,746
Reaction score
1,028
Look at it this way...
How many games did we lose due to piss poor tackling, old and outdated defensive scheme, too many penalties and really poor clock/timeout management? Just fix those issues and this team is in the playoffs. I would expect that a new HC could do this. The rest is gravy in year one.
 

Polk738

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2013
Messages
960
Reaction score
807
I think Macdonald will get the most out of the talent we do have, Mafe, Nwosu, Williams, Reed, Soon, Riq are very talented players-heck he got 9.5 sacks out of Clowney! something he hasn't done since I believe he was with the Texans
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,650
Reaction score
1,671
Location
Roy Wa.
Just remember our O line may be a product of Pete's desired blocking system, he carried it from USC. He wanted do everything players to swap around, maybe if we let these guys focus on their positions envisioned when we drafted we could get better results.
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
5,717
Reaction score
1,758
At the core of the MacDonald defense is a Cover 3 scheme. The thing about it is how he disguises it pre and post snap. That's the thing that makes his defense unique. So I believe he is going to want versatile safeties and linebackers.

He changes coverages a lot but most of the looks end up being a Cover 3. It's not the same cover 3 that the LOB ran.

I think this is what appealed to John Schneider. He saw how the Ravens defense attacked the schemes of McVay and Shanahan. You beat them by confusing them. MacDonald's scheme can confuse the heck out of defenses.
That Ravens Defense sure had Brock Purdy and the 49ers looking confused and throwing picks and taking sacks.
 

Sun Tzu

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
611
Reaction score
743
Location
Corvallis
Just remember our O line may be a product of Pete's desired blocking system, he carried it from USC. He wanted do everything players to swap around, maybe if we let these guys focus on their positions envisioned when we drafted we could get better results.
Interesting take. Not sure there is much of anything to back it up.
 

CallMeADawg

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
2,465
Reaction score
2,118
Not yet but within 2 seasons probably.
We aren't that far off. Draft and free agency can be huge this round. Especially free agency and looking at what Ravens are available. You gotta expect that some of those players will want to come play for Mike in Seattle.
 

Spin Doctor

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
5,242
Reaction score
2,193
We are so cap strapped there isn't a heck of a lot we can do all of a sudden. But I think we could do a little bit, and with some contract maneuvering we could do enough to make a positive difference.
Macdonald could convince Queen to take a bit of a cut on his salary dream and that would be a great assist at LB. Also Clowney will be a FA that won't be too expensive and had a very productive year this year because our new HC knew just how to use him. I've always liked Clowney, just thought he wasn't being used right. Letting Taylor go would help a little bit to pay for the exchange. Ravens have a DL brute that would help us a lot but will be very expensive so I don't see that one happening.
Hiring the right OC will also make a difference, especially if we can help that line in the draft. IOW we can begin improving right away without having to go through desperate losing years.
I am confident Macdonald already has a lot of ideas for how to make this team a winner or he wouldn't even have considered taking the job.
There are a couple of reasons why I feel like our defense could take a step up right away.

1. We were playing catch-up with Pete Carroll and Clint Hurtt. Carroll realized that the defensive landscape had changed in the NFL. That is what Clint Hurtt was all about, Fangio's concepts along with a few others had become the dominant meta in the NFL. Hurtt had been in Carroll's ear about those changes, but neither of them could implement the system properly. Modern NFL defenses come with all of the complexity of modern NFL offense. Just lining up and doing what we do was no longer an applicable. What we got is a defense that lacked identity. It tried straddle the line between a modern NFL defense and the keep it simple stupid philosophy of Pete Carroll. Our defense lacked direction and identity.

2. MacDonald is at the cutting edge of the NFL defensive meta. He's been a terror both at the collegiate and NFL level. Carroll and Hurtt tried implementing this style of defense without having any first hand experience with it. We hired a defensive coordinator that didn't having any experience with this style of defense and we had a head coach that had never used these schemes. It was a recipe for failure and ultimately it led to Pete Carroll's demise. Instead of trying to adapt, he is ahead of just about everyone in the defensive sphere right now. He's been some variation of this stuff since college, implementation is going to go A LOT smoother.

3. MacDonald has coached under both of the Harbaughs. If he has learned from their management style, he's going to run a much tighter ship than Carroll did. Carroll's style was a double edged sword. It allowed players to be themselves but it also leads to undisciplined teams. The style of defense MacDonald runs requires a lot of discipline and communication, something our defense has lacked for years under Carroll's teams.

4. There is a lot of fat that can be cut from our books. We likely can bring in a few guys that know his scheme better after cutting a few guys off our books. I suspect that Lockett is going to be a cap causality among a few others.
 

djb28

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
223
I hope that we have a better system to keep players healthy. It seemed like it was a constant for a few years and I am unsure if it was the system, the luck of the draw, or what?
 

morgulon1

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
7,855
Reaction score
3,720
Location
Spokane, Wa
Man, I hope we see 90 percent an influx of new players on this team….

This team needs a ton of new young talent….

I hope we don’t keep the current players (majority) and just see how MacDonald does with them.

Let the man build his own team and not fix Carroll’s team…
Yeah there is going to be turnover. This could take some time but I'm looking forward to what will come.
 
Top