TVHAWK":2av46pkw said:
Prolly was our best WR at that time, was pretty good, but was a selfish player who didn't ever get the TEAM concept.. He avoided optional off season workouts like the plague, even when vrtually all the other starters were out there working out and sweating their asses off, he chose to not be there... And I'll never forget the game where he was injured and not suited up, and for some unknown reason, instead of sitting on the sidelines and supporting his teamates, The TV cameras kept showing him sitting up in someones luxury box and drinking a Mike's hard lemonade....HaHa what a great teamate !!!!! I'm old, I remember this stuff....
:les:
Pure unadulterated BULLCRAP. DJack was selfish and didn't get "the team concept"? BULLLCRAP. I'm old. I remember this stuff too. Go read my post about two specific legendary moments. The guy got concussed so badly that his brain shut down and PLAYED THE NEXT WEEK and was CLEARLY the best player on the field. No "team concept"? "Selfish"? Come on man.
Players sit in the box all the time when deactivated. ALL THE TIME. Especially when they are INJURED. You are just making stuff up to trash a man's good name. He had a contract qualm with Holmgren. Guess what? Most players did. Do you know why? Because Mike Holmgren is a liar. Yes, now I did the unthinkable and said that. But it's true. How many times did the Walrus say, "Go out there and do your job, and we will take care of you later?" Well, unfortunately he didn't have the authority to do so, and it ended up SCREWING our entire team and organization multiple times. Look at the Branch situation. It was idiotic. Many of us said so at the time. I know Holmgren didn't make that trade. He made the promises though, and then Branch got all of that money from Ruskell for having one good game with the best QB EVER throwing the ball to him. Branch was a selfish player. Maybe you're thinking of him. And if anybody brings up the "one time he stripped the ball in KC proves he was good" argument is going to get a throat punch.
No... I'm not angry. Please don't read it that way. I am all for setting the record straight, and I'm not real big on revisionist history. But I am also totally against painting everything so black and white. I've kind of done it. But I've said straight out DJack had a contract qualm, and in my mind he had every right to it. Disagree if you will, but to question his HEART as a player and call him selfish is an unfair attack on a guy that carried this franchise for a few years in my book. It was Walter.... then a big step down... then Matt... then a tiny step down and Shaun and DJack. That was our team. Those guys carried us every single week. DJack got us into a game we were dead in by moving over into the slot, spotting an opening over the middle (creating a mismatch, which he was GREAT at doing), and caught that dump after the wave to Matt over the middle for a 90+ yard TD. Beautiful, and spoke to his heart and smarts. Darrell is a Seahawks legend and I won't let him get painted with the selfish brush. I won't let it happen. It's not fair, and it's not true.
I can go back and forth on it for weeks and am glad to pull a Doub and start breaking out stats and doing my ridiculous analytical data breakdowns, but that's what I do for work, and hate doing it for free... but will if it is needed. Darrell was a great player. If you don't like the man? Fine. Guess what.... I don't think a lot of people in Washington care for Steve Largent the "person", but I've yet to meet one person that will EVER question Steve Largent "the Seahawk". Do you know why? Because he played with heart and passion, just like Darrell did.