Dan Viens

[LTH]

Think this guy has a VERY balanced look at what's going on with the Hawks. In this Video he asks 3 important questions. Watch the video and answer his questions in this thread.



LTH

 

[knownone]

Interesting questions.

The first question seems obvious. Seattle's been undisciplined against running QBs. Going into the Ravens game, they were #1 in run defense against RBs and 31st against QBs. And while it seems glaring over the last three weeks, it was true even before Nwosu went out. Daniel Jones, for example, ran for 66 yards.

 

[seabowl]

It’s the coaching and player personnel. How many coordinators do we need to go through before the HC really gets the blame by the media? As we know the media controls a lot of what people think and a few harsh article’s pointing out the facts over the last 8 years may change some of the public sentiment about Seahawks management.

 

[keasley45]

Been saying we should swap charbs and kw3 carries..

 

[LTH]

It’s the coaching and player personnel. How many coordinators do we need to go through before the HC really gets the blame by the media? As we know the media controls a lot of what people think and a few harsh article’s pointing out the facts over the last 8 years may change some of the public sentiment about Seahawks management.

It's an interesting point as to why they are NOT running those 12 and13 personnal groupings against the Ravens. It's almost like they are trying to develope certain groupings with certain players with certain schemes to develope against top competition. I have liked what Waldron has done most of the time not so much against the Ravens.

But it was thinking if they run those peronnal grouping to much then teams will adjust to it and it won't be effective when they really need to be. It's almost a balance.

But none of us know exactly why they are doing what they are doing. I wish I could heR the conversation between Waldron and Carroll.

Thoughts?


LTH

 

[BASF]

It is comical to think, but teams have been known to not run their full playbook against teams they think they will face again later in the post season. Maybe they considered the Ravens a potential Super Bowl opponent?

 

[Seahawk_Dan]

It is comical to think, but teams have been known to not run their full playbook against teams they think they will face again later in the post season. Maybe they considered the Ravens a potential Super Bowl opponent?

Putting the cart before the horse right there.

 

[strohmin]

Been saying we should swap charbs and kw3 carries..

Yeah I really dont get why this isnt happening Charbs has been actually pretty great with the amount of touches hes gotten.

 

[strohmin]

It is comical to think, but teams have been known to not run their full playbook against teams they think they will face again later in the post season. Maybe they considered the Ravens a potential Super Bowl opponent?

They dont do that unless they have been proven contenders. The Seahawks have shown nothing that even remotely indicates they should do something like this.