Cowboys vs Packers

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
SomersetHawk":3pthqztn said:
BOOM! Adams! Try and take that one away refs!

Adams is why they don't care if Cobbs leaves, Sweetie.
 

theENGLISHseahawk

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
9,977
Reaction score
0
duckypoo":8s5tx0lu said:
Why not go for the 2 pt? Down by 2 is same as down by 1.

Because there's a full quarter left. If you don't get it and then Dallas gets a TD -- it's a two score game.
 

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
duckypoo":3vz740v8 said:
Why not go for the 2 pt? Down by 2 is same as down by 1.

McCarthy's kind of dumb. Ye, I'm serious.
 

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
theENGLISHseahawk":3ot4zzrr said:
duckypoo":3ot4zzrr said:
Why not go for the 2 pt? Down by 2 is same as down by 1.

Because there's a full quarter left. If you don't get it and then Dallas gets a TD -- it's a two score game.

Or that.

Maybe I'm just ad dumb as McCarthy.
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
theENGLISHseahawk":1660ncdt said:
duckypoo":1660ncdt said:
Why not go for the 2 pt? Down by 2 is same as down by 1.

Because there's a full quarter left. If you don't get it and then Dallas gets a TD -- it's a two score game.

But they'd still need to make a two point conversion in that case. Might as well know now whether or not you need two scores than find out later.
 

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
SomersetHawk":2un4u83t said:
pehawk":2un4u83t said:
SomersetHawk":2un4u83t said:
BOOM! Adams! Try and take that one away refs!

Adams is why they don't care if Cobbs leaves, Sweetie.

Nah. They're not going to let him walk, honey.

Cobb is sooooo slooooowwwww.....Seahawks put Wagner on him. He walks, some dumb team will pay him a lot of money. GB knows the closet-case makes the WR's, they don't make him.
 

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
"I got a downs syndrome haircut...." (to the Nationwide song)
 

BlueBlood

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
1,152
Reaction score
0
HawkGA":1c1y3rim said:
theENGLISHseahawk":1c1y3rim said:
duckypoo":1c1y3rim said:
Why not go for the 2 pt? Down by 2 is same as down by 1.

Because there's a full quarter left. If you don't get it and then Dallas gets a TD -- it's a two score game.

But they'd still need to make a two point conversion in that case. Might as well know now whether or not you need two scores than find out later.

Green Bay scores again they go for two. I tend to agree that they already should have.
 

el capitan

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
658
Reaction score
0
HawkGA":1rg73b7z said:
theENGLISHseahawk":1rg73b7z said:
duckypoo":1rg73b7z said:
Why not go for the 2 pt? Down by 2 is same as down by 1.

Because there's a full quarter left. If you don't get it and then Dallas gets a TD -- it's a two score game.

But they'd still need to make a two point conversion in that case. Might as well know now whether or not you need two scores than find out later.

Or your defense holds and you drive for the go ahead score.
 

jake206

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Messages
1,814
Reaction score
0
Davante Adams...not a bad player...wish Hawks could've drafted someone like that.
 

theENGLISHseahawk

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
9,977
Reaction score
0
HawkGA":2qjxnepr said:
theENGLISHseahawk":2qjxnepr said:
duckypoo":2qjxnepr said:
Why not go for the 2 pt? Down by 2 is same as down by 1.

Because there's a full quarter left. If you don't get it and then Dallas gets a TD -- it's a two score game.

But they'd still need to make a two point conversion in that case. Might as well know now whether or not you need two scores than find out later.

But you'd rather have to get the two pointer later if needed, rather than force it now just to make the scoreboard look nice at the start of the 4th and risk having to score twice to win the game.
 

BlueBlood

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
1,152
Reaction score
0
I absolutely love Russell Wilson but Rodgers is incredible. Russ wouldn't be able to be effective with that injury.
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
theENGLISHseahawk":1rq1kss1 said:
HawkGA":1rq1kss1 said:
theENGLISHseahawk":1rq1kss1 said:
duckypoo":1rq1kss1 said:
Why not go for the 2 pt? Down by 2 is same as down by 1.

Because there's a full quarter left. If you don't get it and then Dallas gets a TD -- it's a two score game.

But they'd still need to make a two point conversion in that case. Might as well know now whether or not you need two scores than find out later.

But you'd rather have to get the two pointer later if needed, rather than force it now just to make the scoreboard look nice at the start of the 4th and risk having to score twice to win the game.

That must be British logic. Probably the same logic y'all used in the Revolutionary War.
 

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
BlueBlood":1muly475 said:
I absolutely love Russell Wilson but Rodgers is incredible. Russ wouldn't be able to be effective with that injury.

You could probably do him.
 
Top