Cyrus12
Well-known member
going to bucs or boys as per his class act agent.
Fair enough about the problems with the legal system. I'm aware that it works both ways. It's tough for men who are falsely accused, and it's tough for women who do get raped and assaulted to get justice. Cases of the latter are too innumerable to begin listing. Both are wrong. It's not a competition between how many "psychobitches" and how many abusive, rapist men are out there. If we were talking about the Seahawks signing Nicole Holder I would have the same reservations I have with Hardy – neither are smart enough to avoid a terrible situation and both are potentially evil sociopaths.olyfan63":260w9w9v said:HawkAroundTheClock":260w9w9v said:If I were accused of something I didn't do I would not pay the alleged victim to avoid a trial. A fair hearing would exonerate me and I'd sue the alleged victim for court costs, damages (lost wages, or potential wages), defamation, harassment, etc.Largent80":260w9w9v said:I agree with Titan31. I have seen so much in all of my years. Have you ever been accused of something you didn't do?
Sorry, but if you really believe you'd have a shot at "a fair hearing" and "recovering court costs" for a female false accuser, you are living in an alternate reality.
What did the falsely accused Duke Lacrosse young men ever receive from their false accuser? Zippo, zilch, nada. And what criminal charges did this false accuser face for the false accusations? Same answer.
You might want to read the article I posted a link to earlier in the thread about how it took 5 false allegations of rape by a woman to finally wind up getting a 2-year jail sentence.
And this Nicole Holder chick is a waitress, not likely to have any coin to pay anyone a cent, other than whatever payoff she may have gotten from Hardy to help her decide to just go away. Truth is, we don't know IF Hardy paid her, and if yes, how much.
Your concept of this scenario, the concept you are arguing from, is simply out of touch with the ugly reality of the situation.
Am I claiming Hardy is a saint? No, it's entirely possible when the coked up chick freaked out and started hitting him and screaming at him and breaking things, that Hardy may have momentarily done something dumb, out of self-defense. As others have pointed out, the only thing a smart guy does is get the hell away from the psychobitch, get witnesses, take video of her going psycho, etc.
Oh yes, and the problem YOU would have if it were YOU in "a fair trial" is that you seem to be one of those Boy Scouts that put all women on a pedestal and would be easy for a clever Borderline sociopath to fool. I submit that if you were falsely accused by one of these monsters, you wouldn't want your clone on the jury. Some people just cannot wrap their head around the fact there are some extremely evil women (men have no monopoly on this), who can present a normal, sympathy-invoking persona to fool the public while turning the screws to the male victim of their false allegations.
HawkFan72":3jz4fp89 said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/578246585076834304[/tweet]
HawkFan72":1xfdvb4a said:That's a lot of coin. Now we know why the Seahawks bowed out. They were likely looking for a Bennett deal from 2013.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/578280570133835776[/tweet]
dontbelikethat":34bcbwkl said:So according to spotrac, he's only counting about 2-3m against the cap for the cowboys, how is that so if his total contract is 1yr and worth 11m and up to 13m? The game day roster incentive bonuses don't count against the cap? Only base salary + sack incentives? Anyone care to explain?
JTB":3skr9lpw said:dontbelikethat":3skr9lpw said:So according to spotrac, he's only counting about 2-3m against the cap for the cowboys, how is that so if his total contract is 1yr and worth 11m and up to 13m? The game day roster incentive bonuses don't count against the cap? Only base salary + sack incentives? Anyone care to explain?
The base salary, workout bonus, and the first game roster bonus count. Everything from week 2 on is a Not Likely To be Earned Incentive, which is based on what he did in 2014 (played 1 game).
If he earns the NLTBE bonuses, they will apply to the 2016 cap.
His cap hit will/could increase over the course of the season. NTLBE incentives, that are paid out before the end of the year, count against the cap when they are paid per the CBA section on per game/snap bonuses.
If he's paid after each game, his cap hit will go up $573,438 per game played. Depending on the amount of games played, that could force the Cowboys into a corresponding cap move for this year. Not sure where Dallas' cap currently stands.
His likely suspension probably ends that necessity though.