RW92":20fnffby said:
Yes, really. They have a chance to win another Super Bowl and their letting pride and egos get in the way. And if you think he was truthful with the answer he gave for the onside kick then your fooling yourself. Hey I love the team as much as you do. I acknowledge his accomplishments. But don't run from the truth of what is happening today. The past won't win any championships. If Kam were there, we win that game, despite the play calling and poor play by the O-line. If I'm wrong I'll own up to it. But Pete and John feel they can win without Kam. No way that happens. You know it and I know it. Bottom line is you can't hide from the truth. But next Sunday evening has me worried. And if Rodgers sees the weakness in Bailey that I see, he will exploit it. Somehow I just hope I'm wrong.
1. Yes, he was telling the truth. The plan was to pooch kick it at an offensive lineman the Rams had been using on kickoffs. They wanted to force that player to try to field the equivalent of a knuckleball. Hauschka whiffed on it. It was a fluke play, in much of the same manner Nick Foles flipped a pass over his head seconds before he was about to be sacked on a big 3rd down. Sometimes these things happen.
2. Kam played in St. Louis last season, where you know.. the Rams won. Kam played in St. Louis in 2013, where the Rams were a yard away from forcing OT. Kam played in St. Louis in 2012, where the Rams won. So.. no.. you cannot say with 100% certainty that Kam Chancellor's presence on the football field reverses what happens yesterday.
3. Worry all you want about Sunday evening. If we lose, there are still 14 games left in the season. However, in the same manner the Rams are a thorn in our ass.. the Seahawks are a thorn in the Packers ass. Some teams just match up better with others. Still it's absolutely hilarious you are quote .. again your words here .. "loosing (sic) patience with Pete Carroll"