MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,998
- Reaction score
- 535
Basis4day":27qz369y said:I thought being a tall guaranteed WR success? It's almost like there is more to being a WR than being tall.
You don't say!
Basis4day":27qz369y said:I thought being a tall guaranteed WR success? It's almost like there is more to being a WR than being tall.
HawkFan72":p14iej6u said:I would love to see them target Matthews with a jump ball in the redzone at some point.
rideaducati":sfw91r0z said:mikeak":sfw91r0z said:BE QUIET
He is our secret weapon on Sunday! I predict two touchdowns
The secret weapon is BJ Daniels on Sunday.
Lol brb brahnanomoz":3eimg19l said:Contemporary culture's proclivity to use a ridiculous number of question marks makes my heart hurt.
I didn't realize I was insulting anyone. I posted my comment without reading any other posts because I thought it would be humorous because (obviously) he isnt a "weapon" if he rarely plays and is never targeted.netskier":3n3t6r3u said:Bjorn, no thanks for the unrequited insult. This is not the smack shack. Calling someone's answer ignorant is insulting to the poster.
Ignoring your insult for the moment, let me just recall for you that the NFC is believed by most here to be significantly stronger than the AFC, so that this weekends game against Green bay is expected to be significantly harder than the actual Superbowl.
In other words, the Packers game IS THE REAL (de facto) SUPERBOWL. Consider last year's games against first the Niners followed by the Broncos.
Besides, I think next man up trumps secrecy here.
Please cool the gratuitous insults. Thanks.