Y'all Ready to Rumble ? 49ers and Ravens

Ambrose83

Active member
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
1,786
Reaction score
4
5_Golden_Rings":2kqzg7yr said:
If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.


Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
 

UK_Seahawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
4,469
Reaction score
513
How can they give the sanders one but not that ? It's nothing short of cheating or utter incompetence.
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
5_Golden_Rings":3ob028ep said:
If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.

What subjectivity?

Earlier than the one they gave the 9ers.
 

5_Golden_Rings

New member
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
2,199
Reaction score
0
Ambrose83":3vhbndtq said:
5_Golden_Rings":3vhbndtq said:
If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.


Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.
 

5_Golden_Rings

New member
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
2,199
Reaction score
0
Smellyman":1xpnfr18 said:
Uncle Si":1xpnfr18 said:
5_Golden_Rings":1xpnfr18 said:
This works out better for the Ravens anyway if he downed it.


Well that's not true

not true not all.

9ers are unsmart
I think it's reasonable to assume a disaster from your own one. It's still early in the drive though. That's Jimmy G inexplicable throw territory.
 

hawksfansinceday1

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
24,629
Reaction score
3
Location
Vancouver, WA
5_Golden_Rings":1m4jwkbc said:
Ambrose83":1m4jwkbc said:
5_Golden_Rings":1m4jwkbc said:
If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.


Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.
The hook is irrelevant to the comparative discussion between the 2 DPI calls. You're being disingenuous
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,378
Location
The pit
5_Golden_Rings":1brjk4eu said:
Ambrose83":1brjk4eu said:
5_Golden_Rings":1brjk4eu said:
If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.


Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.
You don’t get to bitch about calls when your team has been benefiting from bad officiating.
You’re embarrassing yourself.
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,378
Location
The pit
hawksfansinceday1":36cfvlht said:
5_Golden_Rings":36cfvlht said:
Ambrose83":36cfvlht said:
5_Golden_Rings":36cfvlht said:
If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.


Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.
The hook is irrelevant to the comparative discussion between the 2 DPI calls. You're being disingenuous
This.
 

5_Golden_Rings

New member
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
2,199
Reaction score
0
hawksfansinceday1":3v87wi6z said:
5_Golden_Rings":3v87wi6z said:
Ambrose83":3v87wi6z said:
5_Golden_Rings":3v87wi6z said:
If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.


Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.
The hook is irrelevant to the comparative discussion between the 2 DPI calls. You're being disingenuous
You ignored half of my points. You're being disingenuous.
 

hawksfansinceday1

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
24,629
Reaction score
3
Location
Vancouver, WA
5_Golden_Rings":2el96032 said:
hawksfansinceday1":2el96032 said:
5_Golden_Rings":2el96032 said:
Ambrose83":2el96032 said:
Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.
The hook is irrelevant to the comparative discussion between the 2 DPI calls. You're being disingenuous
You ignored half of my points. You're being disingenuous.
You brought up the supposed hook. It's irrelevant to whether the DPI call and non-call were legit. I never said anything about your other points. Try to keep up man.
 
Top