Sports Hernia
Well-known member
And there’s another one.Mizak":3mzjgd7j said:Bull$hit no DPI on 49ers.
And there’s another one.Mizak":3mzjgd7j said:Bull$hit no DPI on 49ers.
hawksfansinceday1":5b0wq9ni said:IMO it was but won't be called on challengeTreeRon":5b0wq9ni said:IMO, no PI
5_Golden_Rings":2kqzg7yr said:If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.
5_Golden_Rings":3ob028ep said:If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.
5_Golden_Rings":2g9ebg44 said:This works out better for the Ravens anyway if he downed it.
B.UK_Seahawk":1iqeoa95 said:How can they give the sanders one but not that ? It's nothing short of cheating or utter incompetence.
Uncle Si":2x2ikx8h said:5_Golden_Rings":2x2ikx8h said:This works out better for the Ravens anyway if he downed it.
Well that's not true
Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.Ambrose83":3vhbndtq said:5_Golden_Rings":3vhbndtq said:If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.
Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
I think it's reasonable to assume a disaster from your own one. It's still early in the drive though. That's Jimmy G inexplicable throw territory.Smellyman":1xpnfr18 said:Uncle Si":1xpnfr18 said:5_Golden_Rings":1xpnfr18 said:This works out better for the Ravens anyway if he downed it.
Well that's not true
not true not all.
9ers are unsmart
The hook is irrelevant to the comparative discussion between the 2 DPI calls. You're being disingenuous5_Golden_Rings":1m4jwkbc said:Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.Ambrose83":1m4jwkbc said:5_Golden_Rings":1m4jwkbc said:If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.
Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
You don’t get to bitch about calls when your team has been benefiting from bad officiating.5_Golden_Rings":1brjk4eu said:Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.Ambrose83":1brjk4eu said:5_Golden_Rings":1brjk4eu said:If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.
Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
This.hawksfansinceday1":36cfvlht said:The hook is irrelevant to the comparative discussion between the 2 DPI calls. You're being disingenuous5_Golden_Rings":36cfvlht said:Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.Ambrose83":36cfvlht said:5_Golden_Rings":36cfvlht said:If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.
Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
You ignored half of my points. You're being disingenuous.hawksfansinceday1":3v87wi6z said:The hook is irrelevant to the comparative discussion between the 2 DPI calls. You're being disingenuous5_Golden_Rings":3v87wi6z said:Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.Ambrose83":3v87wi6z said:5_Golden_Rings":3v87wi6z said:If there is subjectivity in interpretation in there the call should stand.
Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?
You brought up the supposed hook. It's irrelevant to whether the DPI call and non-call were legit. I never said anything about your other points. Try to keep up man.5_Golden_Rings":2el96032 said:You ignored half of my points. You're being disingenuous.hawksfansinceday1":2el96032 said:The hook is irrelevant to the comparative discussion between the 2 DPI calls. You're being disingenuous5_Golden_Rings":2el96032 said:Yeah, because there was no question about whether or not he went through his back or shoulder. Not to mention on the same play George Kittle was hooked.Ambrose83":2el96032 said:Yet the one on the Ravens was PI?