- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 11,647
- Reaction score
- 6,495
Fuller just ran a 4.33. Anyone films buffs have a strong opinion on him? He checks the Seahawks for having a unique field tilting quality so maybe a discussion is warranted. Thoughts?
austinslater25":3m0qsmao said:Fuller just ran a 4.33. Anyone films buffs have a strong opinion on him? He checks the Seahawks for having a unique field tilting quality so maybe a discussion is warranted. Thoughts?
Erebus":35vfnfar said:I don't know how much sense he makes for the Seahawks. They clearly have bigger needs early, but those needs may be able to be filled later. Do they just want a whole bunch of WRs that are fast big play threats? Or do they want some variety, such as adding a tall possession WR? I don't know the answer to this. If they just want speed, then Fuller might be our guy.
Hendo66":3m1kr79a said:Doctson would be a great addition. Especially if Kearse leaves.
McGruff":dxbtuigf said:Erebus":dxbtuigf said:I don't know how much sense he makes for the Seahawks. They clearly have bigger needs early, but those needs may be able to be filled later. Do they just want a whole bunch of WRs that are fast big play threats? Or do they want some variety, such as adding a tall possession WR? I don't know the answer to this. If they just want speed, then Fuller might be our guy.
I think the team has a pretty clear history at the position. They view size as a luxury, speed and agility as necessities. They will not compromise speed to get bigger.
Erebus":2pkrru7c said:McGruff":2pkrru7c said:Erebus":2pkrru7c said:I don't know how much sense he makes for the Seahawks. They clearly have bigger needs early, but those needs may be able to be filled later. Do they just want a whole bunch of WRs that are fast big play threats? Or do they want some variety, such as adding a tall possession WR? I don't know the answer to this. If they just want speed, then Fuller might be our guy.
I think the team has a pretty clear history at the position. They view size as a luxury, speed and agility as necessities. They will not compromise speed to get bigger.
Except they have, several times. Chris Harper and Kevin Norwood are recent examples. They obviously want size too.
McGruff":fjhw8lrf said:Erebus":fjhw8lrf said:McGruff":fjhw8lrf said:Erebus":fjhw8lrf said:I don't know how much sense he makes for the Seahawks. They clearly have bigger needs early, but those needs may be able to be filled later. Do they just want a whole bunch of WRs that are fast big play threats? Or do they want some variety, such as adding a tall possession WR? I don't know the answer to this. If they just want speed, then Fuller might be our guy.
I think the team has a pretty clear history at the position. They view size as a luxury, speed and agility as necessities. They will not compromise speed to get bigger.
Except they have, several times. Chris Harper and Kevin Norwood are recent examples. They obviously want size too.
Both were 4.5 speed guys. They were big and fast.
Erebus":awelq0bz said:McGruff":awelq0bz said:[
I wasn't suggesting they want slow pokes. I was raising the possibility that they may want some size to go with all their shorter receivers, which Fuller doesn't offer.
cheese22":1n616ebo said:Garrett doesn't look 4.5 fast. A couple other guys with good height that won't go until the last couple rounds are Devon Cajuste and Kenny Lawler. Lawler is more dynamic with good yac's. Cajuste is probably the best blocker with some of the best hands in the draft. Lawler could go middle rounds while Cajuste is projected 6th or 7th round. I'd love to get Cajuste because of size, hands and blocking.
I think he's the best wr in the draft, he may not be the first off the board but he will be up there when they do those redraft articles. Someone is going to get a steal.McGruff":3temiost said:Hendo66":3temiost said:Doctson would be a great addition. Especially if Kearse leaves.
Doctson IMO is the best high point jump ball catcher in the draft.